From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethdev: add enum type for loop on Rx/Tx offloads Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 12:00:28 +0000 Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258A0AB2111@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1521518424-3603-1-git-send-email-wei.dai@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Dai, Wei" To: "Dai, Wei" , "thomas@monjalon.net" Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E335F1B for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 13:00:31 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1521518424-3603-1-git-send-email-wei.dai@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Wei, >=20 > This patch adds enum rte_eth_rx_offload_type and > enum rte_eth_tx_offload_type. For a loop on all > Rx offloads, it is convenient to begin with the > first enum member ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_FIRST_FEATURE > and to end at ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_TOTAL_NUM. > A loop on all Tx offloads can begin with > ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_FIRST_FEATURE and end at > ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_TOTAL_NUM. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Wei Dai > --- > lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= ++++++ > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+) >=20 > diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.= h > index 0361533..0089ea3 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h > +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h > @@ -946,6 +946,27 @@ struct rte_eth_conf { > DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_FILTER | \ > DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND) >=20 > +enum rte_eth_rx_offload_type { > + ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_FIRST_FEATURE =3D 0, > + ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_STRIP =3D ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_FIRST_FEATURE, > + ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM, > + ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM, > + ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM, > + ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_LRO, > + ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_QINQ_STRIP, > + ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_IPV4_CKSUM, > + ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_MACSEC_STRIP, > + ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_HEADER_SPLIT, > + ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_FILTER, > + ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND, > + ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME, > + ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_CRC_STRIP, > + ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER, > + ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_TIMESTAMP, > + ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_SECURITY, > + ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_TOTAL_NUM > +}; > + > /* > * If new Rx offload capabilities are defined, they also must be > * mentioned in rte_rx_offload_names in rte_ethdev.c file. > @@ -981,6 +1002,29 @@ struct rte_eth_conf { > */ > #define DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_SECURITY 0x00020000 >=20 > +enum rte_eth_tx_offload_type { > + ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_FIRST_FEATURE =3D 0, > + ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_INSERT =3D ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_FIRST_FEATURE, > + ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM, > + ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM, > + ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM, > + ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_SCTP_CKSUM, > + ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_TSO, > + ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_TSO, > + ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_OUTER_IPV4_CKSUM, > + ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_QINQ_INSERT, > + ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_VXLAN_TNL_TSO, > + ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_GRE_TNL_TSO, > + ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_IPIP_TNL_TSO, > + ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_GENEVE_TNL_TSO, > + ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MACSEC_INSERT, > + ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE, > + ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MULTI_SEGS, > + ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE, > + ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_SECURITY, > + ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_TOTAL_NUM > +}; What is the purpose to introduce these enums? It looks like they are not used anywhere? Konstantin > + > /* > * If new Tx offload capabilities are defined, they also must be > * mentioned in rte_tx_offload_names in rte_ethdev.c file. > -- > 2.7.5