From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Varghese, Vipin" <vipin.varghese@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Timer library changes
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 02:39:03 +0000
Message-ID: <4C9E0AB70F954A408CC4ADDBF0F8FA7D4D31BFAA@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com>
References: <1544205180-31546-1-git-send-email-erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>
 <1544739996-26011-1-git-send-email-erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>
 <BE54F058557D9A4FAC1D84E2FC6D8757233BD63C@fmsmsx115.amr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "techboard@dpdk.org" <techboard@dpdk.org>
To: "Carrillo, Erik G" <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>, "rsanford@akamai.com"
 <rsanford@akamai.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
In-Reply-To: <BE54F058557D9A4FAC1D84E2FC6D8757233BD63C@fmsmsx115.amr.corp.intel.com>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi Erik,

Apologies if I am reaching out a bit late. Please find my query below

<snipped>
> > This enables primary and secondary processes to modify the same timer
> > list, which enables some multi-process use cases that were not
> > previously possible; e.g. a secondary process can start a timer whose
> > expiration is detected in a primary process running a new flavor of
> timer_manage().
Does this mean the following, primary can detect the timer expire primed by=
 secondary. On calling new timer_manage() from primary will it invoke call =
back handler of secondary? If yes, has this been tested with shared library=
 too?
<snipped>