From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927D8C433ED for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 07:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1741661008 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 07:44:11 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1741661008 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev-bounces@dpdk.org Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC6C411C5; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:44:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com (szxga07-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.35]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F2140683 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:44:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga07-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FNzKN1St2zBrTx for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:41:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.103.128] (10.67.103.128) by DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:44:01 +0800 From: "Min Hu (Connor)" To: CC: , , , References: <1616830818-3127-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> <75f5ed48-4a6a-6987-cc1b-cb41eb79d713@huawei.com> Message-ID: <52bfabf3-8157-83b1-e795-24b12d08ed11@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:44:01 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <75f5ed48-4a6a-6987-cc1b-cb41eb79d713@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.103.128] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] fix check of port and core X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi,Ferruh, bernard, tomasz, bruce and all, Any comments about this set of patches? 在 2021/4/10 17:14, Min Hu (Connor) 写道: > Hi,Ferruh, bernard, tomasz, bruce and all, >     Any comments about this set of patches? > > 在 2021/3/27 15:40, Min Hu (Connor) 写道: >> Currently, some examples check that the port is on the same NUMA >> node as the polling thread for best performance. The method is >> to compare the socket id of port and that of current core. If the >> result is different, warning info will be given. >> >> But it ignores the port which is from numa node 0, that is, no >> warning info will be given if the port is from numa node 0, and >> this set of patches will fix it. >> >> Min Hu (Connor) (3): >>    examples/flow_classify: fix check of port and core >>    examples/l2fwd-cat: fix check of port and core >>    examples/skeleton: fix check of port and core >> >>   examples/flow_classify/flow_classify.c | 2 +- >>   examples/l2fwd-cat/l2fwd-cat.c         | 2 +- >>   examples/skeleton/basicfwd.c           | 2 +- >>   3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> > .