From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shreyansh Jain Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] testpmd: make use of per-PMD TxRx parameters Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 12:09:06 +0530 Message-ID: <5ebc9b94-16be-fdfc-0e0a-7594d4f5b952@nxp.com> References: <20180406145002.27480-1-remy.horton@intel.com> <20180406145002.27480-5-remy.horton@intel.com> <560b67af-3650-7be6-d4d6-b0de6bf00c0c@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" To: Remy Horton Return-path: Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-he1eur01on0041.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.0.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3698F1BA1F for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:23:55 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tuesday 10 April 2018 11:39 AM, Remy Horton wrote: > > On 10/04/2018 05:18, Shreyansh Jain wrote: > [..] >>> I'll add in the snippet above. 18.05 integration deadline has I think >>> passed, but documentation changes will still get in. >> >> @thomas you won't be integrating these default conf patches in 18.05? >> > > I meant that since the v5 and v6 will only differ in terms of docs, the > additional changes should get in.. Oh, Ok. My bad. I read it as original issue in documentation (of default burst size) can be merged but this patch might not ... Thanks for clarification.