DPDK-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Liron Himi <lironh@marvell.com>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>,
	Liron Himi <lironh@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re:  [PATCH] config: update Marvell ARMADA
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 06:32:17 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR18MB2398661EC7A2264A588B699DC6430@MN2PR18MB2398.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALBAE1PKhjdv-L98Z5Sk4JbKKuY9O0P37w6KjpGmk=s71rHZ_A@mail.gmail.com>



Regards,
Liron

-----Original Message-----
From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com> 
Sent: Monday, 2 December 2019 06:12
To: Liron Himi <lironh@marvell.com>
Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>; dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>; dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] config: update Marvell ARMADA

>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 3:55 PM <lironh@marvell.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Liron Himi <lironh@marvell.com>
> >
> > disable more NXP modules that conflict with MUSDK
>
> # Please share more details on the conflict.
> [L.H.] both components calls of_<x> APIs so when MUSDK is compiled statically it conflicts with NXP's code.

If something implemented in the library, IMO, it should start with the library name to avoid namespace collision.
Are we implementing of_x calls in MUSDK? 
[L.H.] yes. It is not the same implementation as in dpaa_of.c
Could you share the error logs?
[L.H.] /home/userlab/work/combined_git/dataplane/musdk/usr/local/lib/libmusdk.a(libmusdk_la-of.o): In function `of_n_addr_cells':
/home/userlab/work/combined_git/dataplane/musdk/src/env/of.c:348: multiple definition of `of_n_addr_cells'
/home/userlab/work/combined_git/dataplane/dpdk-19.11/build/lib/librte_common_dpaax.a(dpaa_of.o):dpaa_of.c:(.text+0x13b8): first defined here

> Note that the original armada config already had some NXP flags disabled, but in recent version NXP moved the of_<x> code to be depends on 'CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_COMMON_DPAAX' so needed to update it.

OK

> # What about meson build? "make" will be deprecated soon.
> [L.H.] only when compiling the MUSDK as static LIBs, we face this issue. In meson we need to compile MUSDK as shared LIBS.

But nothing stopping us to compile MUSDK as static build with meson. Right?
[L.H.] right, but currently it will not work AFAIK there is no way to exclude modules from meson builds per configuration file (as we have with 'make' flow), right?

> # This scheme won't work for distro build, Please spend the effort to analyze the conflict and fix the conflict. IMO, That would be the correct solution.
>
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liron Himi <lironh@marvell.com>
> > ---
> >  config/defconfig_arm64-armada-linuxapp-gcc | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/config/defconfig_arm64-armada-linuxapp-gcc
> > b/config/defconfig_arm64-armada-linuxapp-gcc
> > index 059180284..c09751cf0 100644
> > --- a/config/defconfig_arm64-armada-linuxapp-gcc
> > +++ b/config/defconfig_arm64-armada-linuxapp-gcc
> > @@ -19,6 +19,23 @@ CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_MVSAM_CRYPTO=y
> >
> >  # Disable NXP as it is conflict with MUSDK 
> > CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_DPAA_BUS=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_COMMON_DPAAX=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_FSLMC_BUS=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_DPAA2_MEMPOOL=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_DPAA2_PMD=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_DPAA_BUS=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_DPAA_MEMPOOL=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_DPAA_PMD=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_DPAA_EVENTDEV=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_DPAA_SEC=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_CAAM_JR=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_DPAA2_EVENTDEV=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_DPAA2_SEC=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_DPAA2_CMDIF_RAWDEV=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_DPAA2_QDMA_RAWDEV=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PFE_PMD=n
> > +CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ENETC_PMD=n
> > +
> >
> >  # Doesn't support NUMA
> >  CONFIG_RTE_EAL_NUMA_AWARE_HUGEPAGES=n
> > --
> > 2.23.0
> >

  reply index

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-29  9:11 [dpdk-dev] " lironh
2019-11-29 14:05 ` Jerin Jacob
2019-11-29 19:00   ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Liron Himi
2019-12-02  4:11     ` Jerin Jacob
2019-12-02  6:32       ` Liron Himi [this message]
2019-12-02  7:01         ` Liron Himi
2019-12-02  7:33           ` Jerin Jacob
2020-01-23 10:01             ` Jerin Jacob

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MN2PR18MB2398661EC7A2264A588B699DC6430@MN2PR18MB2398.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=lironh@marvell.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/dpdk-dev/0 dpdk-dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dpdk-dev dpdk-dev/ https://lore.kernel.org/dpdk-dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dpdk-dev

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git