From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E28FC2D0DC for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 17:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB3D2072C for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 17:01:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=intel.onmicrosoft.com header.i=@intel.onmicrosoft.com header.b="dqtMSM0f" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BFB3D2072C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev-bounces@dpdk.org Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F012D1BFE1; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 18:01:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0048E1C123 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 18:01:06 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Jan 2020 09:01:06 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,387,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="216039434" Received: from fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.202]) by fmsmga007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Jan 2020 09:01:05 -0800 Received: from FMSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.10) by fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 09:01:05 -0800 Received: from FMSEDG002.ED.cps.intel.com (10.1.192.134) by fmsmsx110.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 09:01:04 -0800 Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.56.175) by edgegateway.intel.com (192.55.55.69) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 09:01:05 -0800 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=n65/LCCDWImtTOs1gbNyt2qvGRt1ROssDU5nm8tvxdOH9nzpBiVY3d5utFfF2iLGOGwmH8JNmxdItReSRF2M/pz7zmTuaaaduEKCLMF89ZES0Icx0DSLR/3eZxS42lzt0ObgwylbJS2nYTQJsmj9XJicgdKpFsKt8icdU9rIuNXpGnsJwmRQ0w6QOynXE8rsm5bti/dbYmYW0URnP70z9n47HCPL2GYhG6lnF8wSVwTAgl2OZGJQ2KrZV6/sIYcv65wZu7YS9wd1E72HT/F6IsO8EjHEDh1nhBWGkRl7F5zN62GvCNoXAoe2Qo41MK26eX0yoojIiuwiD15+aR0i+A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=NKNODXxcIoXQ2FHAvvRpHOepMR2SgmjKZROGjlcw+kk=; b=fISpmo+WHmsohBUb66dnzegasClCVphd+LWKPrvCOIZbF4p/WJBCdZY5sqmZkJ6sh6oS9q5zxABv1q68mGPGMO4Vr9vm1MsRySeuT4WpfzEoB+8k1IzOysxl3ZAGau5tsXxp0UuWXUK/z+9rP2OmpRlyQ9fE9P3ZsikdCYlZBCWnVFdrQXvGsTK+tQ/6WpnXKlFnPFCh9bkwgcLU95vP5ezkFjlnugyh+X+Ama3gxxmap6MP49GPGwXuELBn08Zl/DI2xdC/U7y9adXUyUcJZcDR1qWUEIGFL28cfdi5Ly2eKnN/VsYEGZevjCS7QZGPgnsg92/zjpSAcq5Kl5wFcQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=intel.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-intel-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=NKNODXxcIoXQ2FHAvvRpHOepMR2SgmjKZROGjlcw+kk=; b=dqtMSM0f736Kd3fBLNAYRXLjNArFSYCCoNUMNV7FXIfws8MlVEh+ZJrxEBr0zdaIuU/p3RQBQjBtzU/Q3VgxTZcmz1gLXAsXZ+lbLi3bN/LjpH64NIKDVkqnmPkWiWChpfwgO1auP+QvKtjvKl2rMxhL0CyqoBWP3fEZvO3mdhM= Received: from SN6PR11MB2558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.94.19) by SN6PR11MB2702.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.95.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2602.10; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 17:00:49 +0000 Received: from SN6PR11MB2558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4d86:362a:13c3:8386]) by SN6PR11MB2558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4d86:362a:13c3:8386%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2602.012; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 17:00:49 +0000 From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" To: Honnappa Nagarahalli , "olivier.matz@6wind.com" , "sthemmin@microsoft.com" , "jerinj@marvell.com" , "Richardson, Bruce" , "david.marchand@redhat.com" , "pbhagavatula@marvell.com" CC: "dev@dpdk.org" , "dharmik.thakkar@arm.com" , "ruifeng.wang@arm.com" , "gavin.hu@arm.com" , "nd@arm.com" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v7 15/17] test/ring: adjust run-on-all-cores perf test cases Thread-Index: AQHVtvBrehmt9hsJDUKcznOf6Iour6fXrisw Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 17:00:49 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20190906190510.11146-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> <20191220044524.32910-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> <20191220044524.32910-16-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20191220044524.32910-16-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiNmViOTRlZjgtMjYxZi00NTllLWJhNDAtY2E0ODgzYTExNDIwIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiTXN5bTdITGwzVkZIQng3cmx2RmZVc01SalNnQTJTRVY0a05LWnpGZDd1Q0R3WGloRjNING5GdGVEUXJqTFB6MyJ9 dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.2.0.6 x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com; x-originating-ip: [192.198.151.189] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: ae4058d9-eabd-4b52-00dc-08d78fa55176 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN6PR11MB2702: x-ld-processed: 46c98d88-e344-4ed4-8496-4ed7712e255d,ExtAddr x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:4714; x-forefront-prvs: 0270ED2845 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(136003)(396003)(366004)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(189003)(199004)(110136005)(5660300002)(81166006)(81156014)(8676002)(316002)(9686003)(52536014)(4744005)(55016002)(8936002)(54906003)(26005)(4326008)(2906002)(66946007)(7416002)(186003)(76116006)(7696005)(66556008)(66476007)(6506007)(33656002)(66446008)(478600001)(86362001)(71200400001)(64756008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SN6PR11MB2702; H:SN6PR11MB2558.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 5hmJth/9U0vATx46qkXOkhKnnYJxxcQQhFW+3mlsvyW02PLGioOkSb74hZPKxv9MasBXvKcPutGFXt3qt+5Op7a9hhT9mxKJa2zwBY84oI0x0wBkiNF3k0iwkO/OEOIpXdfjZ+I/y+x8mVy6k1HrDe2838NTkoj6cJLnS6lrdoxAEoc+YWg4IIrhs5YiT36BDohz67LUY3LPZehBKjF9PCkHiF5zZ4oz1XkK9x+fifR+L4hl+0XA0G4mttq4XW5cUXDt7jlupH0dMuQ19qXHh6LNzCPfYx298mq8T/qK/TpSKEIOO8GJIBqXca2dbR4JEadkQ0HR7BP94qFOXML665xCueQ184uLnTeXOwZJifB9FqQ4Izn3LMoAM1SzWnAs4wPJGYwMM0Y9nigrSTTP7AlF+WlYUJim/y+N+uhtI5kvIhpgtOZ4hBadSSvWnfAN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: ae4058d9-eabd-4b52-00dc-08d78fa55176 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Jan 2020 17:00:49.3549 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 46c98d88-e344-4ed4-8496-4ed7712e255d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: xC4o5nevJV2iMIll6xr1ILI4hTzl+0fzXas5Kvs2/ZpxThe4Z3NwSIszT7IJLxfDK8DVxriAIRobmbf17eiJOVNMqCheQKFXinDNLuhb3HY= X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN6PR11MB2702 X-OriginatorOrg: intel.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 15/17] test/ring: adjust run-on-all-cores perf test cases X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" >=20 > Adjust run-on-all-cores test case to use legacy APIs. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli > Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu > --- > app/test/test_ring_perf.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >=20 > diff --git a/app/test/test_ring_perf.c b/app/test/test_ring_perf.c > index b893b5779..fb95e4f2c 100644 > --- a/app/test/test_ring_perf.c > +++ b/app/test/test_ring_perf.c > @@ -520,6 +520,9 @@ test_ring_perf(void) > dequeue_bulk) < 0) > return -1; > } > + printf("\n### Testing using all slave nodes ###\n"); > + if (run_on_all_cores(r) < 0) > + return -1; > rte_ring_free(r); >=20 > TEST_RING_CREATE(RING_NAME, 16, RING_SIZE, rte_socket_id(), 0, r); > @@ -567,9 +570,6 @@ test_ring_perf(void) > return -1; > } >=20 > - printf("\n### Testing using all slave nodes ###\n"); > - run_on_all_cores(r); > - No run_on_all_cores() for 16B elems case? > rte_ring_free(r); >=20 > return 0; >