From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/bonding: switch to new offloading flags Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 18:14:21 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20180313122444.160759-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , Radu Nicolau To: Matan Azrad , Declan Doherty Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9212B4F93 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 19:14:24 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 3/14/2018 12:50 PM, Matan Azrad wrote: > Questions: > Have you an idea why bonding PMD doesn't adjust the slaves port configurations to the bonding port configuration like he does for slave queue configuration? > Is the responsibility to fill the slave port configuration structure for the application? > > What do you think about next configuration checks (both per port and per queue)? > Validate the actual bonding offloads with the bonding capability. > Validate that the queue offloads includes all the port configured offloads. I don't have answers for these, perhaps Declan or Radu can help.