From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_DISCARD, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3C8C433DF for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 08:20:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC934208FE for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 08:20:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=oktetlabs.ru header.i=@oktetlabs.ru header.b="Ok0BfE8r" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BC934208FE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=oktetlabs.ru Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev-bounces@dpdk.org Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 755741D64C; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 10:20:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from shelob.oktetlabs.ru (shelob.oktetlabs.ru [91.220.146.113]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D931D173 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 10:20:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.38.17] (aros.oktetlabs.ru [192.168.38.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by shelob.oktetlabs.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 864F27F587; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:20:09 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 shelob.oktetlabs.ru 864F27F587 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=oktetlabs.ru; s=default; t=1602490809; bh=ldlw6jWroKqmECic6Ng4nc9sYHKgtjP3y2J4iasLcT0=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Ok0BfE8rArLuB2BN9RenRagSguDUuJ3oLV8zFqvzTQyHVWpuQetVPNP+xvKu9SKj0 Qb+rcPUXaL9ip/ApcQCw7gKbgjxOAyp8olrv+VyYMcoolXDJbB0EEu9pQC7NlckjoV m49re5He1p7wiWx/lSkA+4Me/Q8/6Zvt4bqECKD4= To: Olivier Matz , dev@dpdk.org Cc: Ferruh Yigit , Somnath Kotur , Stephen Hemminger , Thomas Monjalon References: <20200106083423.26600-1-somnath.kotur@broadcom.com> <20201006072232.27755-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com> From: Andrew Rybchenko Organization: OKTET Labs Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:20:08 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201006072232.27755-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mbuf: extend meaning of QinQ stripped bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 10/6/20 10:22 AM, Olivier Matz wrote: > From: Somnath Kotur > > Clarify the documentation of QinQ flags, and extend the meaning of the > flag: if PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED is set and PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED is unset, > only the outer VLAN is removed from packet data, but both tci are saved > in mbuf->vlan_tci (inner) and mbuf->vlan_tci_outer (outer). > > Signed-off-by: Somnath Kotur > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko