From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Remy Horton Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] testpmd: make use of per-PMD TxRx parameters Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 07:09:20 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20180406145002.27480-1-remy.horton@intel.com> <20180406145002.27480-5-remy.horton@intel.com> <560b67af-3650-7be6-d4d6-b0de6bf00c0c@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: John McNamara , Wenzhuo Lu , Jingjing Wu , Qi Zhang , Beilei Xing To: Shreyansh Jain , "dev@dpdk.org" , Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8885F1B8DC for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:09:24 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 10/04/2018 05:18, Shreyansh Jain wrote: [..] >> I'll add in the snippet above. 18.05 integration deadline has I think >> passed, but documentation changes will still get in. > > @thomas you won't be integrating these default conf patches in 18.05? > I meant that since the v5 and v6 will only differ in terms of docs, the additional changes should get in..