From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
Michael Santana <maicolgabriel@hotmail.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, "Ananyev\,
Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>, "Wang\,
Yipeng1" <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>, "Gobriel\,
Sameh" <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>, "Burakov\,
Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>, Gavin Hu <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
"juraj.linkes\@pantheon.tech" <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>,
nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] no-huge unit test
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 09:25:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7t1rps8m9k.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR08MB3986D97C8750B3538AF7C3119EF90@AM0PR08MB3986.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (Ruifeng Wang's message of "Mon, 16 Mar 2020 08:27:49 +0000")
Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com> writes:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 23:54
>> To: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>; Michael Santana
>> <maicolgabriel@hotmail.com>; Bruce Richardson
>> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
>> <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; Cristian Dumitrescu
>> <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>; Wang, Yipeng1
>> <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>;
>> dev <dev@dpdk.org>; Burakov, Anatoly <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>;
>> Gavin Hu <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>; Honnappa Nagarahalli
>> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech; nd
>> <nd@arm.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] no-huge unit test
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 2:04 PM Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> writes:
>> >
>> > > Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> writes:
>> > >
>> > >> For environments (such as containers) where hugetlbfs are not
>> > >> available, some unit tests can be run with 'no-huge' option.
>> > >>
>> > >> fast-tests suites is generated dynamically according to hugetlbfs
>> > >> availability in building environment. This allows unit test to run
>> > >> in different environments using the same suite name.
>> > >>
>> > >> Several test cases are fixed to be able to run in no-huge mode.
>> > >
>> > > This looks great! Thanks, Ruifeng.
>> > >
>> > > I'm going to ack it once I see it run under the robot :)
>> >
>> > Just looking through the robot's run, it seems that on the statically
>> > linked Arm64 build, the disk quota is getting exceeded. Do we need to
>> > request some more disk quota for this somehow? Is the build getting
>> > too large?
>>
>> It seems to repeat.
>> https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/297840285#L2975
>>
>> Do you know how much space we have in travis?
>> Is the (c?)cache getting too big?
>
> Yes, it is probably caused by cache.
> I hit the disk quota issue as well when running Travis against the latest Master code.
> After deleting caches, the issue was gone. Then Travis run with this
> series of patches also got a pass.
>
> Hi Aaron,
> Is is OK to clear cache of robot and re-run the build?
I can do this, but I am concerned that we will need to disable the cache
to avoid this error on a consistent basis.
> Thanks.
> /Ruifeng
>
>> You can find out the per job cache size via the travis cli.
>>
>>
>> --
>> David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-16 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-25 7:32 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] ci: add test suite run without hugepage Ruifeng Wang
2020-02-25 9:14 ` David Marchand
2020-02-25 14:36 ` Aaron Conole
2020-02-25 15:39 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-02-25 15:56 ` Aaron Conole
2020-02-26 2:47 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-02-25 15:23 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-02-28 4:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] no-huge test suite Ruifeng Wang
2020-02-28 4:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] ci: allow multiple test suites to run in one job Ruifeng Wang
2020-02-28 4:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] ci: add test suite run without hugepage Ruifeng Wang
2020-03-04 17:31 ` Aaron Conole
2020-03-05 3:41 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-03-05 14:36 ` Aaron Conole
2020-03-06 8:09 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-03-06 15:56 ` Aaron Conole
2020-03-06 16:05 ` David Marchand
2020-03-06 16:16 ` Aaron Conole
2020-03-06 16:33 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-03-07 14:36 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-03-12 7:13 ` Juraj Linkeš
2020-03-12 8:33 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-03-13 8:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] no-huge unit test Ruifeng Wang
2020-03-13 8:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] test: enable tests to run in no-huge mode Ruifeng Wang
2020-03-17 12:49 ` Aaron Conole
2020-03-17 19:15 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2020-03-13 8:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] ci: generate fast-tests suite base on hugepage availability Ruifeng Wang
2020-03-17 12:50 ` Aaron Conole
2020-03-23 8:56 ` David Marchand
2020-03-23 9:32 ` David Marchand
2020-03-23 15:50 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-03-28 16:17 ` David Marchand
2020-03-30 16:03 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-04-10 12:25 ` David Marchand
2020-03-23 15:36 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-03-13 8:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] ci: proceed with verification without hugepage Ruifeng Wang
2020-03-17 12:50 ` Aaron Conole
2020-03-13 8:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] ci: enable unit test for aarch64 Ruifeng Wang
2020-03-17 12:50 ` Aaron Conole
2020-03-13 12:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] no-huge unit test Aaron Conole
2020-03-13 13:04 ` Aaron Conole
2020-03-13 15:54 ` David Marchand
2020-03-16 8:27 ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-03-16 13:25 ` Aaron Conole [this message]
2020-03-16 14:13 ` Aaron Conole
2020-03-16 14:41 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-03-17 17:02 ` dwilder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7t1rps8m9k.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com \
--to=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=Gavin.Hu@arm.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=maicolgabriel@hotmail.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=sameh.gobriel@intel.com \
--cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).