From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12914C282DD for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C142077C for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:13:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="YxlbCtoW" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B5C142077C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev-bounces@dpdk.org Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41BE1EAAA; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 16:13:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [205.139.110.61]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC121EA8A for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 16:13:18 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1578669198; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=19ZwXjHjA+iyRFhXEgQpgkHZsG+BlYlIe47okPuFQUQ=; b=YxlbCtoWpmv5vamJcVCUD1iw/rb+4vxaAVMAwLGGJeTyuLEFyHwGb2MHoBFjeHokpdvlN5 5EgYZvz2K+Lhq1OD7NBiWnEcCb5+2aF7CYe4cYg1DSyo7eB5y6/kJ7QkbTMYIne26eIsCH OUTDlIcrlHfLeKVcOlet37rE4SkR2kw= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-186-Fg95-BTnNJKyVhqj0Rk_aQ-1; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 10:13:16 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8C2318557C6; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com (unknown [10.18.25.108]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C2B119C58; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:13:11 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: Ruifeng Wang Cc: maicolgabriel@hotmail.com, thomas@monjalon.net, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, arybchenko@solarflare.com, dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, gavin.hu@arm.com, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, nd@arm.com References: <20191218053902.193417-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> <20200110095350.80925-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> <20200110095350.80925-3-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 10:13:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20200110095350.80925-3-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> (Ruifeng Wang's message of "Fri, 10 Jan 2020 17:53:50 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-MC-Unique: Fg95-BTnNJKyVhqj0Rk_aQ-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] ci: add travis ci support for aarch64 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Ruifeng Wang writes: > Add Travis compilation jobs for aarch64. gcc/clang compilations for > static/shared libraries are added. > > Some limitations for current aarch64 Travis support: > 1. Container is used. Huge page is not available due to security reason. > 2. Missing kernel header package in Xenial distribution. > > Solutions to address the limitations: > 1. Not to add unit test for now. And run tests with no-huge in future. > 2. Use Bionic distribution for all aarch64 jobs. > > Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang > Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu > --- I think the above text should probably include 'native' since there are already aarch64 builds that go (but they are cross compiled). I also am glad that you didn't remove them. Acked-by: Aaron Conole