From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: Major 2.6.38 regression ignored? Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 09:41:45 +0100 Message-ID: <013811$4lfs6@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com> References: <201105201306.31204.luke@dashjr.org> Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ray Lee , Luke-Jr , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, LKML List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:08:56 -0700, Ray Lee wrote: > [ Adding Chris Wilson (author of the problematic patch) and Rafael Wysocki > to the message ] > > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Luke-Jr wrote: > > > I submitted https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33662 a month ago > > against 2.6.38. Now 2.6.39 was just released without the regression being > > addressed. This bug makes the system unusable... Some guys on IRC suggested > > I > > email, so here it is. > > > > See the bugzilla entry for the bisection history. Which has nothing to do with Luke's bug. Considering the thousand things that can go wrong during X starting, without a hint as to which it is nigh on impossible to debug except by trial and error. If you set up netconsole, does the kernel emit an OOPS with it's last dying breath? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre