dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@collabora.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] drm/rockchip: Use drm_gem_fb_create_with_dirty
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 18:33:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <023053cb-9f72-c29a-ec2f-cf7532ff5c43@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191115092120.4445-5-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Hi Daniel,

After applying this patch there are some slight differences
in the effective behavior of the code.

I can't tell if they are important, please see below.

Andrzej

W dniu 15.11.2019 o 10:21, Daniel Vetter pisze:
> If rockchip would switch over to the generic fbdev setup we could
> grabage collect even more of all this code (all of the remaining fb
> handling code really).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> Cc: Sandy Huang <hjc@rock-chips.com>
> Cc: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c | 54 +---------------------
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 53 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c
> index ca01234c037c..081dbdaa0b07 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_fb.c
> @@ -53,64 +53,12 @@ rockchip_fb_alloc(struct drm_device *dev, const struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 *mode_cm
>   	return fb;
>   }
>   
> -static struct drm_framebuffer *
> -rockchip_user_fb_create(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file_priv,
> -			const struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 *mode_cmd)
> -{
> -	const struct drm_format_info *info = drm_get_format_info(dev,
> -								 mode_cmd);
> -	struct drm_framebuffer *fb;
> -	struct drm_gem_object *objs[ROCKCHIP_MAX_FB_BUFFER];
> -	struct drm_gem_object *obj;
> -	int num_planes = min_t(int, info->num_planes, ROCKCHIP_MAX_FB_BUFFER);
> -	int ret;
> -	int i;
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < num_planes; i++) {

drm_gem_fb_create_with_funcs(), if no error happens,
iterates exactly info->num_planes times,
but the function being removed here iterates
min_t(int, info->num_planes, 3) times.

Is it ensured earlier elsewhere that info->num_planes does not exceed 3?

> -		unsigned int width = mode_cmd->width / (i ? info->hsub : 1);
> -		unsigned int height = mode_cmd->height / (i ? info->vsub : 1);
> -		unsigned int min_size;
> -
> -		obj = drm_gem_object_lookup(file_priv, mode_cmd->handles[i]);
> -		if (!obj) {
> -			DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev->dev,
> -				      "Failed to lookup GEM object\n");
> -			ret = -ENXIO;
> -			goto err_gem_object_unreference;
> -		}
> -
> -		min_size = (height - 1) * mode_cmd->pitches[i] +
> -			mode_cmd->offsets[i] +
> -			width * info->cpp[i];

This computation in drm_gem_fb_create_with_funcs looks like this:

		min_size = (height - 1) * mode_cmd->pitches[i]
			 + drm_format_info_min_pitch(info, i, width)
			 + mode_cmd->offsets[i];

Perhaps that's actually the same thing?

> -
> -		if (obj->size < min_size) {
> -			drm_gem_object_put_unlocked(obj);
> -			ret = -EINVAL;
> -			goto err_gem_object_unreference;
> -		}
> -		objs[i] = obj;
> -	}
> -
> -	fb = rockchip_fb_alloc(dev, mode_cmd, objs, i);
> -	if (IS_ERR(fb)) {
> -		ret = PTR_ERR(fb);
> -		goto err_gem_object_unreference;
> -	}
> -
> -	return fb;
> -
> -err_gem_object_unreference:
> -	for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> -		drm_gem_object_put_unlocked(objs[i]);
> -	return ERR_PTR(ret);
> -}
> -
>   static const struct drm_mode_config_helper_funcs rockchip_mode_config_helpers = {
>   	.atomic_commit_tail = drm_atomic_helper_commit_tail_rpm,
>   };
>   
>   static const struct drm_mode_config_funcs rockchip_drm_mode_config_funcs = {
> -	.fb_create = rockchip_user_fb_create,
> +	.fb_create = drm_gem_fb_create,

That way you leave out the ->dirty() callback from
static const struct drm_framebuffer_funcs rockchip_drm_fb_funcs

I'd say instead:

struct drm_framebuffer *
rockchip_gem_fb_create(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file,
		       const struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 *mode_cmd)
{
	return drm_gem_fb_create_with_funcs(dev, file, mode_cmd,
					    &rockchip_drm_fb_funcs);
}

and then

+	.fb_create = rockchip_gem_fb_create,

>   	.output_poll_changed = drm_fb_helper_output_poll_changed,
>   	.atomic_check = drm_atomic_helper_check,
>   	.atomic_commit = drm_atomic_helper_commit,
> 

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-27 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-15  9:21 [PATCH 0/8] fb_create drive-through cleanups Daniel Vetter
2019-11-15  9:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-15  9:21 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/fb: More paranoia in addfb checks Daniel Vetter
2019-11-15 10:49   ` Pekka Paalanen
2019-11-15 12:44   ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-11-15 15:26     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-15  9:21 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/atmel: ditch fb_create wrapper Daniel Vetter
2019-11-15  9:21   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-15  9:33   ` Boris Brezillon
2019-11-19 21:22     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-23  8:49       ` Sam Ravnborg
2019-11-23  8:49         ` Sam Ravnborg
2019-11-15  9:21 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/mediatek: don't open-code drm_gem_fb_create Daniel Vetter
2019-11-15  9:21   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-22  7:42   ` CK Hu
2019-11-22 17:09     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-22 17:09       ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-15  9:21 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/rockchip: Use drm_gem_fb_create_with_dirty Daniel Vetter
2019-11-15  9:21   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-27 11:45   ` Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
2019-11-27 11:45     ` Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
2019-11-27 17:33   ` Andrzej Pietrasiewicz [this message]
2019-11-27 17:54     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-15  9:21 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/tilcdc: Drop drm_gem_fb_create wrapper Daniel Vetter
2019-11-15  9:21   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-15 13:21   ` Jyri Sarha
2019-11-15 13:21     ` Jyri Sarha
2019-11-19 21:25     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-19 21:25       ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-15  9:21 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/xen: Simplify fb_create Daniel Vetter
2019-11-15 10:33   ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2019-11-15 10:33     ` Oleksandr Andrushchenko
2019-11-19 21:25     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-15  9:21 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/hibmc: Use drm_gem_fb_create Daniel Vetter
2019-11-22  8:09   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2019-11-22  8:16   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2019-11-22  9:12     ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-15  9:21 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/todo: Add entry for fb funcs related cleanups Daniel Vetter
2019-11-15  9:21   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-11-20 10:46   ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=023053cb-9f72-c29a-ec2f-cf7532ff5c43@collabora.com \
    --to=andrzej.p@collabora.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).