Hi Am 21.06.22 um 11:38 schrieb David Gow: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:06 AM José Expósito > wrote: >> >> Add a helper macro to initialize a rectangle from x, y, width and >> height information. >> >> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula >> Acked-by: Thomas Zimmermann >> Signed-off-by: José Expósito >> --- > > This looks good to me, though I have one minor concern about the macro > name. (But if it's okay with the DRM folks, which it seems to be, I > won't object.) > > Either way, > Reviewed-by: David Gow > >> include/drm/drm_rect.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_rect.h b/include/drm/drm_rect.h >> index 6f6e19bd4dac..e8d94fca2703 100644 >> --- a/include/drm/drm_rect.h >> +++ b/include/drm/drm_rect.h >> @@ -47,6 +47,22 @@ struct drm_rect { >> int x1, y1, x2, y2; >> }; >> >> +/** >> + * DRM_RECT_INIT - initialize a rectangle from x/y/w/h >> + * @x: x coordinate >> + * @y: y coordinate >> + * @w: width >> + * @h: height >> + * >> + * RETURNS: >> + * A new rectangle of the specified size. >> + */ >> +#define DRM_RECT_INIT(x, y, w, h) ((struct drm_rect){ \ >> + .x1 = (x), \ >> + .y1 = (y), \ >> + .x2 = (x) + (w), \ >> + .y2 = (y) + (h) }) >> + > > My only slight concern here is that it might be a little bit confusing > that a macro called DRM_RECT_INIT() accepts x/y/w/h, whereas the > actual struct drm_rect is x1/y1/x2/y2. If the macro were called > something like DRM_RECT_INIT_FROM_XYWH() or similar. The existing drm_rect_init() function uses xywh arguments. So the current name is consistent with existing practice. I don't think we refer to x2,y2 much, if ever. Best regards Thomas > > >> /** >> * DRM_RECT_FMT - printf string for &struct drm_rect >> */ >> -- >> 2.25.1 >> -- Thomas Zimmermann Graphics Driver Developer SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev