From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: CK Hu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/25] drm/mediatek: add ovl0/ovl0_2l usecase Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:20:20 +0800 Message-ID: <1555402820.11519.6.camel@mtksdaap41> References: <1553667561-25447-1-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com> <1553667561-25447-21-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1553667561-25447-21-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com Cc: p.zabel@pengutronix.de, robh+dt@kernel.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, airlied@linux.ie, mark.rutland@arm.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Bibby.Hsieh@mediatek.com, yt.shen@mediatek.com List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Hi, Yongqiang: On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 14:19 +0800, yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com wrote: > From: Yongqiang Niu > > This patch add ovl0/ovl0_2l usecase > in ovl->ovl0_2l direct link usecase: > 1. the crtc support layer number will 4+2 > 2. ovl0_2l background color input select ovl0 when crtc init > and disable it when crtc finish > 3. config ovl0_2l layer, if crtc config layer number is > bigger than ovl0 support layers(max is 4) > > Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c > index 11e3404..0f97ee3 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c > @@ -283,6 +283,13 @@ static int mtk_crtc_ddp_hw_init(struct mtk_drm_crtc *mtk_crtc) > > for (i = 0; i < mtk_crtc->ddp_comp_nr; i++) { > struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp = mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[i]; > + enum mtk_ddp_comp_id prev; > + > + if (i > 0) > + prev = mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[i - 1]->id; > + else > + prev = DDP_COMPONENT_ID_MAX; > + mtk_ddp_comp_bgclr_in_on(comp, prev); > > mtk_ddp_comp_config(comp, width, height, vrefresh, bpc); > mtk_ddp_comp_start(comp); > @@ -292,9 +299,18 @@ static int mtk_crtc_ddp_hw_init(struct mtk_drm_crtc *mtk_crtc) > for (i = 0; i < mtk_crtc->layer_nr; i++) { > struct drm_plane *plane = &mtk_crtc->planes[i]; > struct mtk_plane_state *plane_state; > + struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp = mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[0]; > + unsigned int comp_layer_nr = mtk_ddp_comp_layer_nr(comp); > + unsigned int local_layer; > > plane_state = to_mtk_plane_state(plane->state); > - mtk_ddp_comp_layer_config(mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[0], i, > + > + if (i >= comp_layer_nr) { > + comp = mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[1]; > + local_layer = i - comp_layer_nr; > + } else > + local_layer = i; > + mtk_ddp_comp_layer_config(comp , local_layer, > plane_state); > } > > @@ -320,6 +336,7 @@ static void mtk_crtc_ddp_hw_fini(struct mtk_drm_crtc *mtk_crtc) > mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[i]->id); > mtk_disp_mutex_disable(mtk_crtc->mutex); > for (i = 0; i < mtk_crtc->ddp_comp_nr - 1; i++) { > + mtk_ddp_comp_bgclr_in_off(mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[i]); > mtk_ddp_remove_comp_from_path(mtk_crtc->config_regs, > mtk_crtc->mmsys_reg_data, > mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[i]->id, > @@ -340,6 +357,8 @@ static void mtk_crtc_ddp_config(struct drm_crtc *crtc) > struct mtk_crtc_state *state = to_mtk_crtc_state(mtk_crtc->base.state); > struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp = mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[0]; > unsigned int i; > + unsigned int comp_layer_nr = mtk_ddp_comp_layer_nr(comp); > + unsigned int local_layer; > > /* > * TODO: instead of updating the registers here, we should prepare > @@ -362,7 +381,14 @@ static void mtk_crtc_ddp_config(struct drm_crtc *crtc) > plane_state = to_mtk_plane_state(plane->state); > > if (plane_state->pending.config) { > - mtk_ddp_comp_layer_config(comp, i, plane_state); > + if (i >= comp_layer_nr) { > + comp = mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[1]; > + local_layer = i - comp_layer_nr; > + } else > + local_layer = i; > + > + mtk_ddp_comp_layer_config(comp, local_layer, > + plane_state); > plane_state->pending.config = false; > } > } > @@ -604,6 +630,14 @@ int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device *drm_dev, > } > > mtk_crtc->layer_nr = mtk_ddp_comp_layer_nr(mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[0]); > + if (mtk_crtc->ddp_comp_nr > 1) { > + struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp = mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[1]; > + enum mtk_ddp_comp_type comp_type; > + > + comp_type = mtk_ddp_comp_get_type(comp->id); > + if (comp_type == MTK_DISP_OVL || comp_type == MTK_DISP_OVL_2L) I think you need not to invent the function mtk_ddp_comp_get_type() to get the type. Only the component implementing bgclr_in_on() has the ability to the extend the ovl layer, so you could judge bgclr_in_on() exist or not to extend the ovl layer. Regards, CK > + mtk_crtc->layer_nr += mtk_ddp_comp_layer_nr(comp); > + } > mtk_crtc->planes = devm_kcalloc(dev, mtk_crtc->layer_nr, > sizeof(struct drm_plane), > GFP_KERNEL);