From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Luke-Jr" Subject: Re: Major 2.6.38 regression ignored? Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 15:33:46 -0400 Message-ID: <201105211533.49082.luke@dashjr.org> References: <201105201306.31204.luke@dashjr.org> <201105211123.56053.luke@dashjr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Chris Wilson Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Ray Lee , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, LKML , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, perex@perex.cz, "Rafael J. Wysocki" List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:40:17 AM Chris Wilson wrote: > The bisection is into an old DRI1 bug on 945GM. That DRI has inadequate > locking between release and IRQ and so is prone to such races as befell > Kirill should not surprise anyone. As neither UMS nor DRI supported SNB, > I can quite confidently state they are separate bugs. Unfortunately, I cannot help troubleshoot that bug any further, as I no longer have the affected motherboard. I was unable to reproduce it on my Intel DQ67SW. However, I did encounter a new regression, which I have reported as: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35552 This one is related to Intel HD Audio, not Graphics.