From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PULL] drm-intel-next
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:22:14 +0200
Message-ID: <20110713172214.GA16594@pengutronix.de>
References: <yunoc0y9lte.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB"
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <yunoc0y9lte.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Intel drivers <Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org


--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:39:41AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
>=20
> Here's most of the patches I'm hoping to land after 3.0:

Is this one intentionally not in or did it slip through?

drm/i915: gracefully bail out when init_clock_gating-pointer is not set [1]

[1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2011-July/012741.html

Regards,

   Wolfram

--=20
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk4d1EYACgkQD27XaX1/VRuDMgCfTSjDzZJxuLAUm7UrjEH6ITD4
MXkAn0lxvuMxwNlQfQbDNfvNzocTM7Np
=Gii9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB--