From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 regression ignored? Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 22:12:41 +0800 Message-ID: <20110722141241.GA22886@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20110722110806.GA29757@tugrik.mns.mnsspb.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110722110806.GA29757@tugrik.mns.mnsspb.ru> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kirill Smelkov Cc: penberg@kernel.org, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, luke@dashjr.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, rjw@sisk.pl, ray-lk@madrabbit.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, florian@mickler.org, keithp@keithp.com List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > Or would it be more fair to say that UMS is not supported anymore, > is broken and just remove support for it? It's kind of ironic that the intention of the offending patch was to avoid a UMS crash :) Anyway I'm now using KMS (forced to due to new hardware) so I certainly don't have any objections to reverting this patch. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt