From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>
Subject: Re: Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 regression ignored?
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 01:31:02 +0400
Message-ID: <20110722213102.GA14749@tugrik.mns.mnsspb.ru>
References: <201105211123.56053.luke@dashjr.org>
	<aefc95$1usaq@orsmga001.jf.intel.com>
	<20110528131920.GA10467@tugrik.mns.mnsspb.ru>
	<20110712171706.GA18414@tugrik.mns.mnsspb.ru>
	<CAOJsxLEz-fPnb9oYnLMk9UbGqgsfm-g1d2yH=TrEiEk7HvyQzA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110722110806.GA29757@tugrik.mns.mnsspb.ru>
	<yun7h7atcty.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
	<20110722202336.GA14375@tugrik.mns.mnsspb.ru>
	<yunsjpyrqf7.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
	<20110722210814.GC14453@tugrik.mns.mnsspb.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110722210814.GC14453@tugrik.mns.mnsspb.ru>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 01:08:14AM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 01:50:04PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:

> > You're right, of course -- UMS is a huge wart on the kernel driver at
> > this point, keeping it working while also adding new functionality
> > continues to cause challenges. We tend to expect that most people will
> > run reasonably contemporaneous kernel and user space code, and so three
> > years after the switch, it continues to surprise us when someone
> > actually tries UMS.
> 
> We are planning upgrade to KMS too. The kernel is upgraded more often
> compared to userspace, because of already mentioned (thanks!) "no
> regression" rule. Userspace is more complex and more work in my context,
> so it is lagging, but eventually we'll get there.

Also wanted to say, that if whole X could be built, like the kernel, from one
repo without multirepo-setup tool, with 100% reliable working
incremental rebuild, etc... it would be a bit easier to upgrade X too.

Sorry for being a bit offtopic, could not resist. I was keeping that
though in my head for ~ 2 years already, and now had a chance to mention it.



Thanks,
Kirill