From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>
Subject: Re: Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 regression ignored?
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:36:50 +0400
Message-ID: <20110810083650.GB3187@tugrik.mns.mnsspb.ru>
References: <013811$4lfs6@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com>
	<201108091809.58425.anarsoul@gmail.com>
	<20110809153446.GA22077@tugrik.mns.mnsspb.ru>
	<201108091903.00071.anarsoul@gmail.com>
	<20110809163206.GA3410@tugrik.mns.mnsspb.ru>
	<CADU53JVXiX2v+5N-VP8mz6vnxF60BYYXKV_PZQdd_U+qM5Gd6A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110809174001.GA23408@tugrik.mns.mnsspb.ru>
	<CADU53JW0-HaLZcSQ49G8bj2aHBJCL8Ub8MeGYBOd_wZmoDc4Tg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADU53JW0-HaLZcSQ49G8bj2aHBJCL8Ub8MeGYBOd_wZmoDc4Tg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 10:43:08AM -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru> wrote:
> >> If you like, submit a patch. You may now be more up-to-date on those
> >> particular code paths than most of the intel-gfx developers.
> >
> > Ray, I'd agree with you if the topic was about cleanups.
> 
> At this point it is about cleanups unless Keith's patch upthread does
> not work for you. Does it or not?

I've already wrote two weeks ago it does, but if this needs to be
restated one more time here it is: Keith's patch fixes the problem in a
sense that X now starts and seemingly works (thanks), but several issues
remain to be there imho. I've got the message, if it's ok for intel-gfx
to leave them as is - it's ok for me.


Peace,
Kirill