From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PULL] drm-intel-next Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 20:59:47 +0200 Message-ID: <20140506185210.GA5730@phenom.ffwll.local> References: <20140428132613.GA2368@phenom.ffwll.local> <5368DED4.5050401@t-online.de> <87k39zqbju.fsf@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k39zqbju.fsf@intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: Jani Nikula Cc: Daniel Vetter , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:30:45PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 06 May 2014, Knut Petersen wrote: > > On 28.04.2014 15:26, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > The patch below is a clear candidate for 3.15 as it fixes a regression introduced after 3.14 > >> Egbert Eich (1): > >> drm/i915/SDVO: For sysfs link put directory and target in correct order > > > > Daniel, want me to pick that for -fixes? Yeah I geuss so. People never complained that the link isn't there, us adding it for one kernel release to the wrong place doesn't really sound too bothersome. But if this unbreaks a system somewhere then it makes sense to apply to -fixes. Knut, how exactly does your system blow up? -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch