Re: [PATCH 08/11] drm: Enforce unlocked ioctl operation for kms driver ioctls

From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] drm: Enforce unlocked ioctl operation for kms driver ioctls
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 15:45:49 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150908184549.GD2665@joana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441713391-24732-9-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Hi Daniel,

2015-09-08 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>:

> With the prep patches for i915 all kms drivers either have
> DRM_UNLOCKED on all their ioctls. Or the ioctl always directly returns
> with an invariant return value when in modeset mode. But that's only
> the case for i915 and radeon. The drm core ioctls are unfortunately
> too much a mess still to dare this.
> 
> Follow-up patches will remove DRM_UNLOCKED from all kms drivers to
> prove that this is indeed the case.
> 
> Also update the documentation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/DocBook/drm.tmpl | 4 +++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c    | 6 +++++-
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>

	Gustavo
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx