From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] sphinxification for dma-buf docs
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 08:11:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161211081133.4c54e425@lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uFtbzbe0YN5Q6awcZ4DMrn4aqiZZvLW+KHGtdb2mhGaQw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 13:35:49 +0100
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > It seems like just the sort of thing we want to be doing to pull the docs
> > together in a more rational way.
>
> Ok if we pull this in through gfx trees? Will miss 4.10 though, that's
> already finished and in bugfix-only mode.
I've pretty much closed up 4.10 as well.
Here's a thought, though: how about if we slip in a little version of
dma-buf.rst now with a "coming soon, don't miss it!!" message? Then the
rest of the set could go through your tree without touching
driver-api/index.rst and, thus, avoiding the otherwise inevitable
conflicts?
jon
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-11 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-09 18:53 [PATCH 0/5] sphinxification for dma-buf docs Daniel Vetter
2016-12-09 18:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] dma-buf: Extract dma-buf.rst Daniel Vetter
2016-12-11 20:41 ` Jonathan Corbet
2016-12-12 12:30 ` Gustavo Padovan
2016-12-09 18:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] dma-buf: Update kerneldoc for sync_file_create Daniel Vetter
2016-12-12 12:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Gustavo Padovan
2016-12-09 18:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] dma-buf: Reorganize device dma access docs Daniel Vetter
2016-12-09 18:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] dma-buf: Update cpu access documentation Daniel Vetter
2016-12-09 18:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] dma-buf: Final bits of doc polish Daniel Vetter
2016-12-09 21:50 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2016-12-09 21:15 ` [PATCH 0/5] sphinxification for dma-buf docs Jonathan Corbet
2016-12-11 12:12 ` Sumit Semwal
2016-12-11 12:35 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-12-11 15:11 ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]
2016-12-11 17:35 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-12-11 19:44 ` Jonathan Corbet
2016-12-13 12:34 ` Sumit Semwal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161211081133.4c54e425@lwn.net \
--to=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).