From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 10:10:50 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180219101050.0a1514e5@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 939 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
between commit:
117172c8f9d4 ("drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Ignore unsubmitted signalers")
from Linus' tree and commit:
b7a3f33bd5ab ("drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Drop request reference for the signaler thread")
from the drm tree.
These are basically identical for the conflicting section except that
the former added a line:
GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_request_completed(request));
which I left in.
I fixed it up (see above) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next reply other threads:[~2018-02-18 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-18 23:10 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2018-02-20 20:15 ` linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree Rodrigo Vivi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-03-04 1:08 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-04 0:47 Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-08 0:14 Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-19 1:17 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-30 22:57 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-27 23:58 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-29 9:07 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-11-17 2:13 Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-19 0:58 Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-19 7:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-09-19 14:23 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-02-28 3:17 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-29 0:48 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-29 6:52 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2021-10-11 0:37 Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-23 2:41 Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-24 0:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-12 1:20 Stephen Rothwell
2021-07-01 0:52 Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-29 2:14 Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-30 7:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-03-30 23:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-01 1:30 Stephen Rothwell
2021-02-14 22:07 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-18 0:56 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-02 3:42 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-25 3:51 Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-23 0:50 Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13 1:38 Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13 1:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13 1:13 Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13 1:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13 0:58 Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13 0:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13 0:50 Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13 0:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13 0:46 Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13 0:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13 0:40 Stephen Rothwell
2019-11-13 0:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-26 3:12 Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-11 2:19 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-04 3:09 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-26 3:38 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-22 6:37 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-26 3:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-13 1:15 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-18 23:02 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-15 1:08 Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-23 23:37 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180219101050.0a1514e5@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).