From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/dp_mst: Add some atomic state iterator macros
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 15:08:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181029140836.GZ21967@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181026203549.1796-2-lyude@redhat.com>
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 04:35:46PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> ---
> include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> index 59f005b419cf..3faceb66f5cb 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> @@ -628,4 +628,81 @@ int drm_dp_atomic_release_vcpi_slots(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> int drm_dp_send_power_updown_phy(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> struct drm_dp_mst_port *port, bool power_up);
>
> +extern const struct drm_private_state_funcs drm_dp_mst_topology_state_funcs;
> +
> +static inline bool
> +__drm_dp_mst_state_iter_get(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
> + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr **mgr,
> + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state **old_state,
> + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state **new_state,
> + int i)
> +{
> + struct __drm_private_objs_state *objs_state = &state->private_objs[i];
> +
> + if (objs_state->ptr->funcs != &drm_dp_mst_topology_state_funcs)
> + return false;
> +
> + *mgr = to_dp_mst_topology_mgr(objs_state->ptr);
> + if (old_state)
> + *old_state = to_dp_mst_topology_state(objs_state->old_state);
> + if (new_state)
> + *new_state = to_dp_mst_topology_state(objs_state->new_state);
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * for_each_oldnew_mst_mgr_in_state - iterate over all DP MST topology
> + * managers in an atomic update
> + * @__state: &struct drm_atomic_state pointer
> + * @mgr: &struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr iteration cursor
> + * @old_state: &struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state iteration cursor for the old
> + * state
> + * @new_state: &struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state iteration cursor for the new
> + * state
> + * @__i: int iteration cursor, for macro-internal use
> + *
> + * This iterates over all DRM DP MST topology managers in an atomic update,
> + * tracking both old and new state. This is useful in places where the state
> + * delta needs to be considered, for example in atomic check functions.
> + */
> +#define for_each_oldnew_mst_mgr_in_state(__state, mgr, old_state, new_state, __i) \
> + for ((__i) = 0; (__i) < (__state)->num_private_objs; (__i)++) \
> + for_each_if(__drm_dp_mst_state_iter_get((__state), &(mgr), &(old_state), &(new_state), (__i)))
I just realized that all our iterator macros do not compose at all. Whic
is rather disappointing :-/
list_for_each solves that with a list_for_each_member, which you can then
easily use to create more specialized macros. I wonder whether we should
have a master macros, which also takes the obj type (we have very uniform
naming, so a few well placed ## should make this work neatly), and then
you could just #define more specialized iterators without having to retype
them (or the need for dummy iterator markers and tons of casting).
Anyway, that's a lament for another day&patch. This looks good.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> +
> +/**
> + * for_each_old_mst_mgr_in_state - iterate over all DP MST topology managers
> + * in an atomic update
> + * @__state: &struct drm_atomic_state pointer
> + * @mgr: &struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr iteration cursor
> + * @old_state: &struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state iteration cursor for the old
> + * state
> + * @__i: int iteration cursor, for macro-internal use
> + *
> + * This iterates over all DRM DP MST topology managers in an atomic update,
> + * tracking only the old state. This is useful in disable functions, where we
> + * need the old state the hardware is still in.
> + */
> +#define for_each_old_mst_mgr_in_state(__state, mgr, old_state, __i) \
> + for ((__i) = 0; (__i) < (__state)->num_private_objs; (__i)++) \
> + for_each_if(__drm_dp_mst_state_iter_get((__state), &(mgr), &(old_state), NULL, (__i)))
> +
> +/**
> + * for_each_new_mst_mgr_in_state - iterate over all DP MST topology managers
> + * in an atomic update
> + * @__state: &struct drm_atomic_state pointer
> + * @mgr: &struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr iteration cursor
> + * @new_state: &struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state iteration cursor for the new
> + * state
> + * @__i: int iteration cursor, for macro-internal use
> + *
> + * This iterates over all DRM DP MST topology managers in an atomic update,
> + * tracking only the new state. This is useful in enable functions, where we
> + * need the new state the hardware should be in when the atomic commit
> + * operation has completed.
> + */
> +#define for_each_new_mst_mgr_in_state(__state, mgr, new_state, __i) \
> + for ((__i) = 0; (__i) < (__state)->num_private_objs; (__i)++) \
> + for_each_if(__drm_dp_mst_state_iter_get((__state), &(mgr), NULL, &(new_state), (__i)))
> +
> #endif
> --
> 2.17.2
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-29 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-26 20:35 [PATCH v2 0/4] drm/dp_mst: Improve VCPI helpers, use in nouveau Lyude Paul
[not found] ` <20181026203549.1796-1-lyude-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2018-10-26 20:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/dp_mst: Add some atomic state iterator macros Lyude Paul
2018-10-29 14:08 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2018-10-26 20:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI allocations Lyude Paul
2018-10-29 14:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-10-29 16:43 ` Lyude Paul
[not found] ` <20181029142429.GB21967-dv86pmgwkMBes7Z6vYuT8azUEOm+Xw19@public.gmane.org>
2018-10-30 9:04 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-10-26 20:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/dp_mst: Check payload count in drm_dp_mst_atomic_check() Lyude Paul
2018-10-29 14:25 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-10-29 15:34 ` Lyude Paul
2018-10-26 20:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/nouveau: Use atomic VCPI helpers for MST Lyude Paul
2018-10-29 14:11 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181029140836.GZ21967@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).