From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 08/12] dt-bindings: add binding for generic eDP panel Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 09:23:59 +0100 Message-ID: <20190204082353.GE19087@ulmo> References: <20190203185501.8958-1-anarsoul@gmail.com> <20190203185501.8958-9-anarsoul@gmail.com> <20190204074350.GC16448@ulmo> Reply-To: thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="A9z/3b/E4MkkD+7G" Return-path: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Vasily Khoruzhick Cc: David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , Archit Taneja , Andrzej Hajda , Laurent Pinchart , Icenowy Zheng , Sean Paul , dri-devel , devicetree , arm-linux , linux-sunxi List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --A9z/3b/E4MkkD+7G Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 12:13:55AM -0800, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 11:43 PM Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 10:54:57AM -0800, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > > > eDP panels usually have EDID EEPROM, so there's no need to define panel > > > width/height or any modes/timings in dts. But this panel still may have > > > regulator and/or backlight. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick > > > --- > > > .../devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-edp.txt | 7 +++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-edp.txt > > > > Please don't try to make panels look more generic than they really are. > > You're going to have to provide a compatible string for your device that > > is more specific than "panel-edp". You claim that you don't need any > > extra information that is panel specific, but you don't know that now. > > We have in the past thought that we didn't need things like prepare > > delay, but then we ran into situations where we did need them. > > > > Just do what everybody else does. Provide a specific compatible string > > and match on that in the panel-simple driver. Even if you can read all > > the video timings from an EDID EEPROM, you can still provide a mode in > > the panel descriptor to serve as a fallback if for example the EEPROM > > is faulty on some device. > > Pinebook used several 768p panels that have slightly different timings > and recent batch uses 1080p panel. > > What panel descriptor should I use as fallback? You don't use panel descriptors as fallback. The simple-panel driver will bind to a panel device and use the corresponding descriptor. If your device tree contains the correct information, the descriptor is correct for the panel you have. In other words you need to ensure that you have the correct panel in device tree for the board that you're using. This is exactly the same thing as for other devices. One way to to this is to have separate device trees for each variant of the board that you want to support. Another variant may be to have a common device tree and then have some early firmware update the DTB with the correct panel information. Thierry --A9z/3b/E4MkkD+7G--