dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Cc: daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/10] drm/i915: uevent for HDCP status change
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 12:06:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190327110639.GH2665@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190322004448.14045-11-ramalingam.c@intel.com>

On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 06:14:48AM +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
> Invoking the uevent generator for the content protection property state
> change of a connector. This helps the userspace to detect the new state
> change without polling the property val.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdcp.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdcp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdcp.c
> index 1eea553cdf81..1c38026f4de7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_hdcp.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>  
>  #include <drm/drm_hdcp.h>
>  #include <drm/i915_component.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_sysfs.h>
>  #include <linux/i2c.h>
>  #include <linux/random.h>
>  #include <linux/component.h>
> @@ -19,6 +20,14 @@
>  #define ENCRYPT_STATUS_CHANGE_TIMEOUT_MS	50
>  #define HDCP2_LC_RETRY_CNT			3
>  
> +static inline
> +void intel_hdcp_state_change_event(struct drm_connector *connector)
> +{
> +	struct drm_property *property = connector->content_protection_property;
> +
> +	drm_sysfs_connector_status_event(connector, property);
> +}
> +
>  static
>  bool intel_hdcp_is_ksv_valid(u8 *ksv)
>  {
> @@ -943,6 +952,7 @@ static void intel_hdcp_prop_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  	if (hdcp->value != DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_UNDESIRED) {
>  		state = connector->base.state;
>  		state->content_protection = hdcp->value;
> +		intel_hdcp_state_change_event(&connector->base);

I think it'd be good to have a helper to update both
state->content_protection and send out the event. Locking is a bit
complicated, so we also need a lockdep assert to make sure
dev->mode_config.connection_mutex is held.

That way I hope that any update in the property will actually result in
the event being sent out, and not accidentally forgotten.

>  	}
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&hdcp->mutex);
> @@ -2206,6 +2216,7 @@ int intel_hdcp_disable(struct intel_connector *connector)
>  			ret = _intel_hdcp2_disable(connector);
>  		else if (hdcp->hdcp_encrypted)
>  			ret = _intel_hdcp_disable(connector);
> +		intel_hdcp_state_change_event(&connector->base);

Why do we need this here? We don't update the property here ...
-Daniel

>  	}
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&hdcp->mutex);
> -- 
> 2.19.1
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-27 11:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-22  0:44 [PATCH v3 00/10] HDCP2.2 Phase II Ramalingam C
2019-03-22  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] drm/i915: debugfs: HDCP2.2 capability read Ramalingam C
2019-03-27  9:51   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-03-22  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] drm: Add Content protection type property Ramalingam C
2019-03-27  9:56   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-03-27 13:34     ` Ramalingam C
2019-03-22  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] drm/i915: Attach content " Ramalingam C
2019-03-27 10:00   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-03-27 13:39     ` Ramalingam C
2019-03-22  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] drm/i915: HDCP SRM parsing and revocation check Ramalingam C
2019-03-27 10:16   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-03-27 13:48     ` Ramalingam C
2019-03-22  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] drm/i915/sysfs: Node for hdcp srm Ramalingam C
2019-03-22  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] drm: Add CP downstream_info property Ramalingam C
2019-03-27 10:25   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-03-27 14:00     ` Ramalingam C
2019-03-27 14:22       ` Daniel Vetter
2019-03-22  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] drm/i915: Populate downstream info for HDCP1.4 Ramalingam C
2019-03-27 10:28   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-03-22  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] drm/i915: Populate downstream info for HDCP2.2 Ramalingam C
2019-03-27 10:31   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-03-27 14:49     ` Ramalingam C
2019-03-27 17:44       ` Daniel Vetter
2019-03-22  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] drm: uevent for connector status change Ramalingam C
2019-03-27 11:00   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-03-27 11:01   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-03-27 14:40     ` Ramalingam C
2019-03-22  0:44 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] drm/i915: uevent for HDCP " Ramalingam C
2019-03-27 11:06   ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2019-03-27 14:37     ` Ramalingam C
2019-03-27 17:47       ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190327110639.GH2665@phenom.ffwll.local \
    --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ramalingam.c@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).