dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Benjamin GAIGNARD <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>
Cc: "airlied@linux.ie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm: fix parameters documentation style
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 21:21:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200120202129.GB17555@ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <372573cc-b0ae-72cb-f2c3-3f9310c3cf27@st.com>

Hi Benjamin.

On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 08:11:01AM +0000, Benjamin GAIGNARD wrote:
> 
> On 1/18/20 10:41 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > Hi Benjamin
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 05:01:35PM +0100, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> >> Remove old documentation style and use new one to avoid warnings when
> >> compiling with W=1
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>
> > Thanks for the warning fixes.
> > This is legacy stuff that is not even wired into the kernel-doc stuff.
> > But that is no excuse for old-style comments.
> 
> There is still quite a few of them in other drm files (drm_context.c,  
> drm_bufs.c, drm_vm.c, drm_lock.c)
> 
> but I don't know how to fix them. Your advices are welcome.

I have no strong opinion on way forward here.
But if someone (you?) type the patches and they are even acked,
we should not ignore them.

	Sam
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

      reply	other threads:[~2020-01-20 20:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-14 16:01 [PATCH v2] drm: fix parameters documentation style Benjamin Gaignard
2020-01-14 16:04 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-01-18  9:41 ` Sam Ravnborg
2020-01-20  8:11   ` Benjamin GAIGNARD
2020-01-20 20:21     ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200120202129.GB17555@ravnborg.org \
    --to=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@st.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).