From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/amdgpu: implement amdgpu_gem_prime_move_notify v2
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:55:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200217175518.GL2363188@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200217154509.2265-6-christian.koenig@amd.com>
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 04:45:09PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Implement the importer side of unpinned DMA-buf handling.
>
> v2: update page tables immediately
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 6 ++
> 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c
> index 770baba621b3..48de7624d49c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c
> @@ -453,7 +453,71 @@ amdgpu_dma_buf_create_obj(struct drm_device *dev, struct dma_buf *dma_buf)
> return ERR_PTR(ret);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * amdgpu_dma_buf_move_notify - &attach.move_notify implementation
> + *
> + * @attach: the DMA-buf attachment
> + *
> + * Invalidate the DMA-buf attachment, making sure that the we re-create the
> + * mapping before the next use.
> + */
> +static void
> +amdgpu_dma_buf_move_notify(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
> +{
> + struct drm_gem_object *obj = attach->importer_priv;
> + struct ww_acquire_ctx *ticket = dma_resv_locking_ctx(obj->resv);
> + struct amdgpu_bo *bo = gem_to_amdgpu_bo(obj);
> + struct amdgpu_device *adev = amdgpu_ttm_adev(bo->tbo.bdev);
> + struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = { false, false };
> + struct ttm_placement placement = {};
> + struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base *bo_base;
> + int r;
> +
> + if (bo->tbo.mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_SYSTEM)
> + return;
> +
> + r = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->tbo, &placement, &ctx);
> + if (r) {
> + DRM_ERROR("Failed to invalidate DMA-buf import (%d))\n", r);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + for (bo_base = bo->vm_bo; bo_base; bo_base = bo_base->next) {
> + struct amdgpu_vm *vm = bo_base->vm;
> + struct dma_resv *resv = vm->root.base.bo->tbo.base.resv;
> +
> + if (ticket) {
Yeah so this is kinda why I've been a total pain about the exact semantics
of the move_notify hook. I think we should flat-out require that importers
_always_ have a ticket attach when they call this, and that they can cope
with additional locks being taken (i.e. full EDEADLCK) handling.
Simplest way to force that contract is to add a dummy 2nd ww_mutex lock to
the dma_resv object, which we then can take #ifdef
CONFIG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH_DEBUG. Plus mabye a WARN_ON(!ticket).
Now the real disaster is how we handle deadlocks. Two issues:
- Ideally we'd keep any lock we've taken locked until the end, it helps
needless backoffs. I've played around a bit with that but not even poc
level, just an idea:
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm/commit/?id=b1799c5a0f02df9e1bb08d27be37331255ab7582
Idea is essentially to track a list of objects we had to lock as part of
the ttm_bo_validate of the main object.
- Second one is if we get a EDEADLCK on one of these sublocks (like the
one here). We need to pass that up the entire callchain, including a
temporary reference (we have to drop locks to do the ww_mutex_lock_slow
call), and need a custom callback to drop that temporary reference
(since that's all driver specific, might even be internal ww_mutex and
not anything remotely looking like a normal dma_buf). This probably
needs the exec util helpers from ttm, but at the dma_resv level, so that
we can do something like this:
struct dma_resv_ticket {
struct ww_acquire_ctx base;
/* can be set by anyone (including other drivers) that got hold of
* this ticket and had to acquire some new lock. This lock might
* protect anything, including driver-internal stuff, and isn't
* required to be a dma_buf or even just a dma_resv. */
struct ww_mutex *contended_lock;
/* callback which the driver (which might be a dma-buf exporter
* and not matching the driver that started this locking ticket)
* sets together with @contended_lock, for the main driver to drop
* when it calls dma_resv_unlock on the contended_lock. */
void (drop_ref*)(struct ww_mutex *contended_lock);
};
This is all supremely nasty (also ttm_bo_validate would need to be
improved to handle these sublocks and random new objects that could force
a ww_mutex_lock_slow).
Plan B would be to throw our hands into and declare that "move_notify is
best effort only and can fail for any reason". Exactly like ttm eviction
currently does, even with all your hacks to do at least some dma_resv_lock
(but not the full slowpath).
Given how much "fun" you have with all the low memory handling and ttm
fundamentally being best-effort only (despite that dma_resv would allow us
to do this right, with some work) I'm not sure that's a good idea to
extend to a cross-driver interface. Personally I'd lean towards fixing
this first fully (in ttm/amdgpu), and then using that to implement
move_notify correctly.
Or just add an int return value here and mandate that importers must
handle eviction failures. Exactly like ttm_mem_evict_first can currently
still fail for various reasons.
(Sorry this isn't exactly the mail you hoped for)
Cheers, Daniel
> + /* When we get an error here it means that somebody
> + * else is holding the VM lock and updating page tables
> + * So we can just continue here.
> + */
> + r = dma_resv_lock(resv, ticket);
> + if (r)
> + continue;
> +
> + } else {
> + /* TODO: This is more problematic and we actually need
> + * to allow page tables updates without holding the
> + * lock.
> + */
> + if (!dma_resv_trylock(resv))
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + r = amdgpu_vm_clear_freed(adev, vm, NULL);
> + if (!r)
> + r = amdgpu_vm_handle_moved(adev, vm);
> +
> + if (r && r != -EBUSY)
> + DRM_ERROR("Failed to invalidate VM page tables (%d))\n",
> + r);
> +
> + dma_resv_unlock(resv);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static const struct dma_buf_attach_ops amdgpu_dma_buf_attach_ops = {
> + .move_notify = amdgpu_dma_buf_move_notify
> };
>
> /**
> @@ -489,7 +553,7 @@ struct drm_gem_object *amdgpu_gem_prime_import(struct drm_device *dev,
> return obj;
>
> attach = dma_buf_dynamic_attach(dma_buf, dev->dev,
> - &amdgpu_dma_buf_attach_ops, NULL);
> + &amdgpu_dma_buf_attach_ops, obj);
> if (IS_ERR(attach)) {
> drm_gem_object_put(obj);
> return ERR_CAST(attach);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
> index 8ae260822908..8c480c898b0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
> @@ -926,6 +926,9 @@ int amdgpu_bo_pin_restricted(struct amdgpu_bo *bo, u32 domain,
> return 0;
> }
>
> + if (bo->tbo.base.import_attach)
> + dma_buf_pin(bo->tbo.base.import_attach);
> +
> bo->flags |= AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_VRAM_CONTIGUOUS;
> /* force to pin into visible video ram */
> if (!(bo->flags & AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_NO_CPU_ACCESS))
> @@ -1009,6 +1012,9 @@ int amdgpu_bo_unpin(struct amdgpu_bo *bo)
>
> amdgpu_bo_subtract_pin_size(bo);
>
> + if (bo->tbo.base.import_attach)
> + dma_buf_unpin(bo->tbo.base.import_attach);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < bo->placement.num_placement; i++) {
> bo->placements[i].lpfn = 0;
> bo->placements[i].flags &= ~TTM_PL_FLAG_NO_EVICT;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-17 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-17 15:45 RFC: Unpinned DMA-buf handling Christian König
2020-02-17 15:45 ` [PATCH 1/5] dma-buf: add dynamic DMA-buf handling v14 Christian König
2020-02-17 15:50 ` Christian König
2020-02-17 15:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/ttm: remove the backing store if no placement is given Christian König
2020-02-17 15:45 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/amdgpu: use allowed_domains for exported DMA-bufs Christian König
2020-02-17 15:45 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/amdgpu: add amdgpu_dma_buf_pin/unpin v2 Christian König
2020-02-17 15:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/amdgpu: implement amdgpu_gem_prime_move_notify v2 Christian König
2020-02-17 17:55 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2020-02-17 18:58 ` Christian König
2020-02-17 19:38 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-02-18 10:42 ` Christian König
2020-02-18 20:17 ` Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2020-02-18 21:01 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-02-19 6:42 ` Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2020-02-20 9:39 ` Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2020-02-20 18:04 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-02-20 19:46 ` Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2020-02-20 20:08 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-02-20 22:51 ` Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2020-02-21 17:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-02-21 19:45 ` Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2020-02-23 15:45 ` Christian König
2020-02-23 16:54 ` Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2020-02-24 18:46 ` Christian König
2020-02-24 21:11 ` Thomas Hellström (VMware)
2020-02-25 17:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-02-26 16:32 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-02-27 9:20 ` Christian König
2020-02-27 9:38 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200217175518.GL2363188@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).