Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/vgpu.c

between commit:

  04d6067f1f19 ("drm/i915/gvt: Fix unnecessary schedule timer when no vGPU exits")

from the drm-intel-fixes tree and commit:

  12d5861973c7 ("drm/i915/gvt: Make WARN* drm specific where vgpu ptr is available")

from the drm-intel tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/vgpu.c
index 345c2aa3b491,abcde8ce1a9a..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/vgpu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/vgpu.c
@@@ -271,18 -272,12 +272,19 @@@ void intel_gvt_release_vgpu(struct inte
  void intel_gvt_destroy_vgpu(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
  {
  	struct intel_gvt *gvt = vgpu->gvt;
+ 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = gvt->gt->i915;
  
- 	WARN(vgpu->active, "vGPU is still active!\n");
 -	mutex_lock(&vgpu->vgpu_lock);
 -
+ 	drm_WARN(&i915->drm, vgpu->active, "vGPU is still active!\n");
  
 +	/*
 +	 * remove idr first so later clean can judge if need to stop
 +	 * service if no active vgpu.
 +	 */
 +	mutex_lock(&gvt->lock);
 +	idr_remove(&gvt->vgpu_idr, vgpu->id);
 +	mutex_unlock(&gvt->lock);
 +
 +	mutex_lock(&vgpu->vgpu_lock);
  	intel_gvt_debugfs_remove_vgpu(vgpu);
  	intel_vgpu_clean_sched_policy(vgpu);
  	intel_vgpu_clean_submission(vgpu);