From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61756C388F7 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 07:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDCFF24196 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 07:28:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=ziepe.ca header.i=@ziepe.ca header.b="CZio0pvj" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EDCFF24196 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ziepe.ca Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A4A6F3EA; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 07:27:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qt1-x842.google.com (mail-qt1-x842.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::842]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB84E6EEAF for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 23:20:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt1-x842.google.com with SMTP id p88so3652791qtd.12 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:20:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=b4cfx4QZgYz15NDTJwDbByQvqvRvpDxc8U181kXRfhk=; b=CZio0pvjUOAZVmGpPYnoIJZ3k0VTIRDxHgnxsmYuQhsz2jEdpX7JlzXAa5B1lHI4hj 1dkeZm3vsuYQ0+al/4Q5F2/2IuJErhNsTuza+Audcu3R6UagNTTPFO2TOlLXvivwU2k/ TKA9JSMlFjnoXG+A2LL1MAujxpBHcxjoID0aD31L+i9KzL1iVOVlTBMfml1ncQpAA1Ef K50QmLDH8932V/fZEd6cOcCwLbIUGXgj3Ry86gAn7SRneMoAL4zkD8ulKknh501sjbP8 vU0trDw7S+JXN+4tdtkGwNszgrrA7N4l+RnFY0GZRBBOKZJ2H2dSIxQhc+QJQE2SJt1m cPcg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=b4cfx4QZgYz15NDTJwDbByQvqvRvpDxc8U181kXRfhk=; b=ffuHZg8h/vs6yJF5TRUuoxVOJ5zr2qYTuz52ca7MIJhspBmR0W967GFlGsgMvg75Sp DatmKPEbOTfue0SEYn5EjF7cNrVr7Lpz2mOp3c+FINAMs/SHp/ZB8IufZd4IbbfSdwRU XiIKmpr4mIJWssd289V9nnEfg9dkBplrd8g6zmjjmJFFPdoxN+TZYC62AC/IeXtQ1jlh 2EZ8TsAhZOunWVf0UyvPdzGPlVQhQ+eaQeWwao6RP6bFPTZpQ2nKOEni/gRKEZAGpz/m LRW/8ZalgcqH8rxFDyRKiJQAIIrjN9k7yEmnuyt/I0jHa5UDIb+nbb3tSGqWZs2dHz0C kJ+w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5302lCUxZJ5ibTge/OAmBbXg+UDghKbiEDAOfjlZgkN8TsJyBjHQ ohkui4wJ3nsuxYv+9fhFjQdpPA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJylFppbCqYnSmCDnE4ueYGv0xNZzmWfiqeCGK69SNIht11gj1i8NPwvoXi//7kIPj5qPGxCVQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1c39:: with SMTP id a54mr5530504qtk.344.1603322423832; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:20:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ziepe.ca (hlfxns017vw-156-34-48-30.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.ns.bellaliant.net. [156.34.48.30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n63sm2410770qka.45.2020.10.21.16.20.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:20:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jgg by mlx with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kVNP4-003k7m-9M; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:20:22 -0300 Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:20:22 -0300 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/16] PCI: Obey iomem restrictions for procfs mmap Message-ID: <20201021232022.GN36674@ziepe.ca> References: <20201021085655.1192025-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20201021085655.1192025-13-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20201021125030.GK36674@ziepe.ca> <20201021151352.GL36674@ziepe.ca> <20201021163702.GM36674@ziepe.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 07:27:48 +0000 X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390 , linux-samsung-soc , Jan Kara , Kees Cook , KVM list , Daniel Vetter , John Hubbard , LKML , DRI Development , Linux MM , =?utf-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWU=?= Glisse , Linux PCI , Bjorn Helgaas , Daniel Vetter , Dan Williams , Andrew Morton , Linux ARM , "open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 09:24:08PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 6:37 PM Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 05:54:54PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > > The trouble is that io_remap_pfn adjust vma->pgoff, so we'd need to > > > split that. So ideally ->mmap would never set up any ptes. > > > > /dev/mem makes pgoff == pfn so it doesn't get changed by remap. > > > > pgoff doesn't get touched for MAP_SHARED either, so there are other > > users that could work like this - eg anyone mmaping IO memory is > > probably OK. > > I was more generally thinking for io_remap_pfn_users because of the > mkwrite use-case we might have in fbdev emulation in drm. You have a use case for MAP_PRIVATE and io_remap_pfn_range()?? Jason _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel