From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5350AC433ED for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:33:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1555560234 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:33:07 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1555560234 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9856EABB; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:33:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 829376EABB; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E51260FEC; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:33:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1617204782; bh=VEAokRAUwmqk6b1XNvz8xq2ssgOe8XarXhR7rguGo64=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=CcBcHfkJsWOGdBJ54F4tHzTqX8odPThBv/+nD0XArAtpvbHrAUS3tfD4yLFqBUaXA QIInRYII0xdx1nOaRk+v0SR3QhU7nQpWQvM9VNaJVeQhfC5WlD8XyuyDp4rA8fB3AC qzeNuO8OLYAUJTsUGZw7wRW0Gfsjg/mq1nhGmLolpbwE//OYgdwBNalxL0IxznuQrK utcZFNOfP8j+Phf/ENFUerPLJ0/uDGWVsR5mmQHpALnrqdH0ffLWfYgIIAPRdTOAnA 8dcoEDthoYC+/5HqphI9KhMkMzfNppf0PCUVFfgYM5FnvGgHzJ5E2cOcTyJ8oPhL3s OVTrYXihR510A== Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 16:32:57 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Robin Murphy Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/18] iommu: remove DOMAIN_ATTR_DMA_USE_FLUSH_QUEUE Message-ID: <20210331153256.GA7815@willie-the-truck> References: <20210316153825.135976-1-hch@lst.de> <20210316153825.135976-17-hch@lst.de> <20210330131149.GP5908@willie-the-truck> <20210330135801.GA6187@willie-the-truck> <578d6aa5-4239-f5d7-2e9f-686b18e52bba@arm.com> <20210331114947.GA7626@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Li Yang , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Christoph Hellwig , netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, David Woodhouse , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 02:09:37PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 2021-03-31 12:49, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 05:28:19PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > > > On 2021-03-30 14:58, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 02:19:38PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > > > > > On 2021-03-30 14:11, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:38:22PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > > > From: Robin Murphy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Instead make the global iommu_dma_strict paramete in iommu.c canonical by > > > > > > > exporting helpers to get and set it and use those directly in the drivers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This make sure that the iommu.strict parameter also works for the AMD and > > > > > > > Intel IOMMU drivers on x86. As those default to lazy flushing a new > > > > > > > IOMMU_CMD_LINE_STRICT is used to turn the value into a tristate to > > > > > > > represent the default if not overriden by an explicit parameter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy . > > > > > > > [ported on top of the other iommu_attr changes and added a few small > > > > > > > missing bits] > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c | 23 +------- > > > > > > > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 50 +--------------- > > > > > > > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h | 1 - > > > > > > > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 27 +-------- > > > > > > > drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 9 +-- > > > > > > > drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 64 ++++----------------- > > > > > > > drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 27 ++++++--- > > > > > > > include/linux/iommu.h | 4 +- > > > > > > > 8 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 165 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > I really like this cleanup, but I can't help wonder if it's going in the > > > > > > wrong direction. With SoCs often having multiple IOMMU instances and a > > > > > > distinction between "trusted" and "untrusted" devices, then having the > > > > > > flush-queue enabled on a per-IOMMU or per-domain basis doesn't sound > > > > > > unreasonable to me, but this change makes it a global property. > > > > > > > > > > The intent here was just to streamline the existing behaviour of stuffing a > > > > > global property into a domain attribute then pulling it out again in the > > > > > illusion that it was in any way per-domain. We're still checking > > > > > dev_is_untrusted() before making an actual decision, and it's not like we > > > > > can't add more factors at that point if we want to. > > > > > > > > Like I say, the cleanup is great. I'm just wondering whether there's a > > > > better way to express the complicated logic to decide whether or not to use > > > > the flush queue than what we end up with: > > > > > > > > if (!cookie->fq_domain && (!dev || !dev_is_untrusted(dev)) && > > > > domain->ops->flush_iotlb_all && !iommu_get_dma_strict()) > > > > > > > > which is mixing up globals, device properties and domain properties. The > > > > result is that the driver code ends up just using the global to determine > > > > whether or not to pass IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NON_STRICT to the page-table code, > > > > which is a departure from the current way of doing things. > > > > > > But previously, SMMU only ever saw the global policy piped through the > > > domain attribute by iommu_group_alloc_default_domain(), so there's no > > > functional change there. > > > > For DMA domains sure, but I don't think that's the case for unmanaged > > domains such as those used by VFIO. > > Eh? This is only relevant to DMA domains anyway. Flush queues are part of > the IOVA allocator that VFIO doesn't even use. It's always been the case > that unmanaged domains only use strict invalidation. Maybe I'm going mad. With this patch, the SMMU driver unconditionally sets IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NON_STRICT for page-tables if iommu_get_dma_strict() is true, no? In which case, that will get set for page-tables corresponding to unmanaged domains as well as DMA domains when it is enabled. That didn't happen before because you couldn't set the attribute for unmanaged domains. What am I missing? > > > Obviously some of the above checks could be factored out into some kind of > > > iommu_use_flush_queue() helper that IOMMU drivers can also call if they need > > > to keep in sync. Or maybe we just allow iommu-dma to set > > > IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NON_STRICT directly via iommu_set_pgtable_quirks() if we're > > > treating that as a generic thing now. > > > > I think a helper that takes a domain would be a good starting point. > > You mean device, right? The one condition we currently have is at the device > level, and there's really nothing inherent to the domain itself that matters > (since the type is implicitly IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA to even care about this). Device would probably work too; you'd pass the first device to attach to the domain when querying this from the SMMU driver, I suppose. Will _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel