dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Jani Saarinen <jani.saarinen@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 16/19] drm/i915/dg1: Compute MEM Bandwidth using MCHBAR
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:05:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210412090526.30547-17-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210412090526.30547-1-matthew.auld@intel.com>

From: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>

The PUNIT FW is currently returning 0 for all memory bandwidth
parameters. Read the values directly from MCHBAR offsets 0x5918 and
0x4000(4). This is a temporary WA until the PUNIT FW returns valid
values.

v2 (Lucas): Add error to log since this is fixed in new pcode available
on IFWI WW14. Also fix checkpatch warnings.

v3 by Jani:
- switch to intel_uncore_read/intel_uncore_write

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Saarinen <jani.saarinen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
index c5f70f3e930e..99cae0dc0ca2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
@@ -23,6 +23,53 @@ struct intel_qgv_info {
 	u8 t_bl;
 };
 
+#define SA_PERF_STATUS_0_0_0_MCHBAR_PC _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5918)
+#define  DG1_QCLK_RATIO_MASK (0xFF << 2)
+#define  DG1_QCLK_RATIO_SHIFT 2
+#define  DG1_QCLK_REFERENCE (1 << 10)
+
+#define MCHBAR_CH0_CR_TC_PRE_0_0_0_MCHBAR _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x4000)
+#define MCHBAR_CH0_CR_TC_PRE_0_0_0_MCHBAR_HIGH _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x4004)
+#define MCHBAR_CH1_CR_TC_PRE_0_0_0_MCHBAR _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x4400)
+#define MCHBAR_CH1_CR_TC_PRE_0_0_0_MCHBAR_HIGH _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x4404)
+#define  DG1_DRAM_T_RCD_MASK (0x7F << 9)
+#define  DG1_DRAM_T_RCD_SHIFT 9
+#define  DG1_DRAM_T_RDPRE_MASK (0x3F << 11)
+#define  DG1_DRAM_T_RDPRE_SHIFT 11
+#define  DG1_DRAM_T_RAS_MASK (0xFF << 1)
+#define  DG1_DRAM_T_RAS_SHIFT 1
+#define  DG1_DRAM_T_RP_MASK (0x7F << 0)
+#define  DG1_DRAM_T_RP_SHIFT 0
+
+static int dg1_mchbar_read_qgv_point_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
+					  struct intel_qgv_point *sp,
+					  int point)
+{
+	u32 val = 0;
+	u32 dclk_ratio = 0, dclk_reference = 0;
+
+	val = intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore, SA_PERF_STATUS_0_0_0_MCHBAR_PC);
+	dclk_ratio = (val & DG1_QCLK_RATIO_MASK) >> DG1_QCLK_RATIO_SHIFT;
+	if (val & DG1_QCLK_REFERENCE)
+		dclk_reference = 6; /* 6 * 16.666 MHz = 100 MHz */
+	else
+		dclk_reference = 8; /* 8 * 16.666 MHz = 133 MHz */
+	sp->dclk = dclk_ratio * dclk_reference;
+	if (sp->dclk == 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	val = intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore, MCHBAR_CH0_CR_TC_PRE_0_0_0_MCHBAR);
+	sp->t_rp = (val & DG1_DRAM_T_RP_MASK) >> DG1_DRAM_T_RP_SHIFT;
+	sp->t_rdpre = (val & DG1_DRAM_T_RDPRE_MASK) >> DG1_DRAM_T_RDPRE_SHIFT;
+
+	val = intel_uncore_read(&dev_priv->uncore, MCHBAR_CH0_CR_TC_PRE_0_0_0_MCHBAR_HIGH);
+	sp->t_rcd = (val & DG1_DRAM_T_RCD_MASK) >> DG1_DRAM_T_RCD_SHIFT;
+	sp->t_ras = (val & DG1_DRAM_T_RAS_MASK) >> DG1_DRAM_T_RAS_SHIFT;
+
+	sp->t_rc = sp->t_rp + sp->t_ras;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int icl_pcode_read_qgv_point_info(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 					 struct intel_qgv_point *sp,
 					 int point)
@@ -100,7 +147,12 @@ static int icl_get_qgv_points(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 		struct intel_qgv_point *sp = &qi->points[i];
 
 		ret = icl_pcode_read_qgv_point_info(dev_priv, sp, i);
-		if (ret)
+		if (IS_DG1(dev_priv) && (ret || sp->dclk == 0)) {
+			drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm, "Failed to get memory subsystem information via pcode. IFWI needs update. Trying with MCHBAR\n");
+			ret = dg1_mchbar_read_qgv_point_info(dev_priv, sp, i);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+		} else if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
 		drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
-- 
2.26.3

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-12  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-12  9:05 [PATCH 00/19] More DG1 enabling Matthew Auld
2021-04-12  9:05 ` [PATCH 01/19] drm/i915/gt: Skip aperture remapping selftest where there is no aperture Matthew Auld
2021-04-12 14:48   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-04-12  9:05 ` [PATCH 02/19] drm/i915/selftests: Only query RAPL for integrated power measurements Matthew Auld
2021-04-12  9:05 ` [PATCH 03/19] drm/i915: Create stolen memory region from local memory Matthew Auld
2021-04-14 15:01   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-16 15:04     ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-19 14:15       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-12  9:05 ` [PATCH 04/19] drm/i915/stolen: treat stolen local as normal " Matthew Auld
2021-04-14 15:06   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-12  9:05 ` [PATCH 05/19] drm/i915/stolen: enforce the min_page_size contract Matthew Auld
2021-04-14 15:07   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-12  9:05 ` [PATCH 06/19] drm/i915/stolen: pass the allocation flags Matthew Auld
2021-04-14 15:09   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-16 13:53     ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-12  9:05 ` [PATCH 07/19] drm/i915/fbdev: Use lmem physical addresses for fb_mmap() on discrete Matthew Auld
2021-04-12 15:00   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-12  9:05 ` [PATCH 08/19] drm/i915: Return error value when bo not in LMEM for discrete Matthew Auld
2021-04-14 15:16   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-12  9:05 ` [PATCH 09/19] drm/i915/lmem: Fail driver init if LMEM training failed Matthew Auld
2021-04-12  9:05 ` [PATCH 10/19] drm/i915/dg1: Fix mapping type for default state object Matthew Auld
2021-04-12  9:05 ` [PATCH 11/19] drm/i915: Update the helper to set correct mapping Matthew Auld
2021-04-14 15:22   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-14 16:20     ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-15  8:20       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-15  9:23         ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-15 11:05           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-19 11:30             ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-19 14:07               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-19 14:37                 ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-19 15:01                   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-21 11:42                     ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-21 15:41                       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-21 19:13                         ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-26  8:57                           ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-26  9:21                             ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-12  9:05 ` [PATCH 12/19] drm/i915/lmem: Bypass aperture when lmem is available Matthew Auld
2021-04-14 15:33   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-16 14:25     ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-19 14:16       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-04-12  9:05 ` [PATCH 13/19] drm/i915/dg1: Read OPROM via SPI controller Matthew Auld
2021-09-17 23:29   ` [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-12  9:05 ` [PATCH 14/19] drm/i915/oprom: Basic sanitization Matthew Auld
2021-04-12 22:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-04-12 22:36   ` [PATCH] drm/i915/oprom: fix memdup.cocci warnings kernel test robot
2021-05-17 11:57   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/19] drm/i915/oprom: Basic sanitization Jani Nikula
2021-09-18  4:30     ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-09-20  7:41       ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-20  8:04         ` Gupta, Anshuman
2021-09-20  8:43           ` Jani Nikula
2021-09-22 21:53           ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-04-12  9:05 ` [PATCH 15/19] drm/i915: WA for zero memory channel Matthew Auld
2021-04-12 16:57   ` Souza, Jose
2021-04-12  9:05 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2021-04-12  9:05 ` [PATCH 17/19] drm/i915/dg1: Double memory bandwidth available Matthew Auld
2021-04-12  9:05 ` [PATCH 18/19] drm/i915/gtt: map the PD up front Matthew Auld
2021-04-12 15:17   ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-04-12 16:01     ` Jani Nikula
2021-04-12 16:36       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-12 16:08     ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-12 17:00       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-13  9:28         ` Matthew Auld
2021-04-13 10:18           ` Daniel Vetter
2021-04-12  9:05 ` [PATCH 19/19] drm/i915/gtt/dgfx: place the PD in LMEM Matthew Auld
2021-04-14 15:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210412090526.30547-17-matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=jani.saarinen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).