dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 2/4] drm: panel: sofef00: remove reset GPIO handling
       [not found] <20210502014146.85642-1-caleb@connolly.tech>
@ 2021-05-02  1:42 ` Caleb Connolly
  2021-05-25 15:36   ` Bjorn Andersson
  2021-06-24 15:32   ` Linus Walleij
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Caleb Connolly @ 2021-05-02  1:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: caleb, Thierry Reding, Sam Ravnborg, David Airlie, Daniel Vetter
  Cc: linux-arm-msm, phone-devel, ~postmarketos/upstreaming, dri-devel,
	linux-kernel

Resetting the panel on fajita causes it to never come back, we aren't
quite sure why this is so for now lets remove reset handling as it is
effectively broken. It is also not needed on enchilada.

Signed-off-by: Caleb Connolly <caleb@connolly.tech>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-sofef00.c | 26 +++----------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-sofef00.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-sofef00.c
index 8cb1853574bb..cfc8b2a19742 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-sofef00.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-sofef00.c
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ struct sofef00_panel {
 	struct drm_panel panel;
 	struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi;
 	struct regulator *supply;
-	struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio;
 	const struct drm_display_mode *mode;
 	bool prepared;
 };
@@ -42,16 +41,6 @@ struct sofef00_panel *to_sofef00_panel(struct drm_panel *panel)
 			return ret;					\
 	} while (0)
 
-static void sofef00_panel_reset(struct sofef00_panel *ctx)
-{
-	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->reset_gpio, 0);
-	usleep_range(5000, 6000);
-	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->reset_gpio, 1);
-	usleep_range(2000, 3000);
-	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->reset_gpio, 0);
-	usleep_range(12000, 13000);
-}
-
 static int sofef00_panel_on(struct sofef00_panel *ctx)
 {
 	struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = ctx->dsi;
@@ -132,12 +121,9 @@ static int sofef00_panel_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	sofef00_panel_reset(ctx);
-
 	ret = sofef00_panel_on(ctx);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize panel: %d\n", ret);
-		gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->reset_gpio, 1);
 		return ret;
 	}
 
@@ -155,8 +141,11 @@ static int sofef00_panel_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
 		return 0;
 
 	ret = sofef00_panel_off(ctx);
-	if (ret < 0)
+
+	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Failed to un-initialize panel: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
 
 	regulator_disable(ctx->supply);
 
@@ -276,13 +265,6 @@ static int sofef00_panel_probe(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	ctx->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
-	if (IS_ERR(ctx->reset_gpio)) {
-		ret = PTR_ERR(ctx->reset_gpio);
-		dev_warn(dev, "Failed to get reset-gpios: %d\n", ret);
-		return ret;
-	}
-
 	ctx->dsi = dsi;
 	mipi_dsi_set_drvdata(dsi, ctx);
 
-- 
2.30.2


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm: panel: sofef00: remove reset GPIO handling
  2021-05-02  1:42 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm: panel: sofef00: remove reset GPIO handling Caleb Connolly
@ 2021-05-25 15:36   ` Bjorn Andersson
  2021-06-24 15:32   ` Linus Walleij
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2021-05-25 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Caleb Connolly
  Cc: David Airlie, linux-arm-msm, linux-kernel, dri-devel,
	Thierry Reding, ~postmarketos/upstreaming, phone-devel,
	Sam Ravnborg

On Sat 01 May 20:42 CDT 2021, Caleb Connolly wrote:

> Resetting the panel on fajita causes it to never come back, we aren't
> quite sure why this is so for now lets remove reset handling as it is
> effectively broken. It is also not needed on enchilada.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Caleb Connolly <caleb@connolly.tech>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-sofef00.c | 26 +++----------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-sofef00.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-sofef00.c
> index 8cb1853574bb..cfc8b2a19742 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-sofef00.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-samsung-sofef00.c
> @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ struct sofef00_panel {
>  	struct drm_panel panel;
>  	struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi;
>  	struct regulator *supply;
> -	struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio;
>  	const struct drm_display_mode *mode;
>  	bool prepared;
>  };
> @@ -42,16 +41,6 @@ struct sofef00_panel *to_sofef00_panel(struct drm_panel *panel)
>  			return ret;					\
>  	} while (0)
>  
> -static void sofef00_panel_reset(struct sofef00_panel *ctx)
> -{
> -	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->reset_gpio, 0);
> -	usleep_range(5000, 6000);
> -	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->reset_gpio, 1);
> -	usleep_range(2000, 3000);
> -	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->reset_gpio, 0);
> -	usleep_range(12000, 13000);
> -}
> -
>  static int sofef00_panel_on(struct sofef00_panel *ctx)
>  {
>  	struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = ctx->dsi;
> @@ -132,12 +121,9 @@ static int sofef00_panel_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	sofef00_panel_reset(ctx);
> -
>  	ret = sofef00_panel_on(ctx);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize panel: %d\n", ret);
> -		gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->reset_gpio, 1);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -155,8 +141,11 @@ static int sofef00_panel_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	ret = sofef00_panel_off(ctx);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> +
> +	if (ret < 0) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to un-initialize panel: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;

This early return seems unrelated to what's described in the commit
message.

Also as a general comment, what do you expect the software should do if
you return an error in the unprepare path? Can we if this happens just
continue to display stuff on the display?

> +	}
>  
>  	regulator_disable(ctx->supply);
>  
> @@ -276,13 +265,6 @@ static int sofef00_panel_probe(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	ctx->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);

If I understand your description in the cover letter this works for one
of the devices using the panel, but not the other.

So how about using devm_gpiod_get_optional() instead. That will give you
NULL back if the property isn't defined and make all the gpiod
operations nops.

Regards,
Bjorn

> -	if (IS_ERR(ctx->reset_gpio)) {
> -		ret = PTR_ERR(ctx->reset_gpio);
> -		dev_warn(dev, "Failed to get reset-gpios: %d\n", ret);
> -		return ret;
> -	}
> -
>  	ctx->dsi = dsi;
>  	mipi_dsi_set_drvdata(dsi, ctx);
>  
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm: panel: sofef00: remove reset GPIO handling
  2021-05-02  1:42 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm: panel: sofef00: remove reset GPIO handling Caleb Connolly
  2021-05-25 15:36   ` Bjorn Andersson
@ 2021-06-24 15:32   ` Linus Walleij
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2021-06-24 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Caleb Connolly
  Cc: David Airlie, MSM, linux-kernel, open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS,
	Thierry Reding,
	open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>, ,
	phone-devel, Sam Ravnborg

On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 3:43 AM Caleb Connolly <caleb@connolly.tech> wrote:

> Resetting the panel on fajita causes it to never come back, we aren't
> quite sure why this is so for now lets remove reset handling as it is
> effectively broken. It is also not needed on enchilada.

Where are the device trees for these platforms?

Are there schematics so we/someone with access to the schematics
can figure it out?

It's not something trivial like forgotten to put GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW
on the gpio phandle?

> -static void sofef00_panel_reset(struct sofef00_panel *ctx)
> -{
> -       gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->reset_gpio, 0);
> -       usleep_range(5000, 6000);
> -       gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->reset_gpio, 1);
> -       usleep_range(2000, 3000);
> -       gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->reset_gpio, 0);
> -       usleep_range(12000, 13000);
> -}

This code looks a bit weird to begin with, I don't see the point
with the first setting the gpiod low, either it was low already or
high already neither matters, driving it asserted will assert it
either way.

No big deal though.

> -       ctx->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);

As Bjorn says: just use *_optional and comment the line out in the
device tree if there is a problem.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-24 15:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20210502014146.85642-1-caleb@connolly.tech>
2021-05-02  1:42 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm: panel: sofef00: remove reset GPIO handling Caleb Connolly
2021-05-25 15:36   ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-06-24 15:32   ` Linus Walleij

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).