From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@samsung.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: fix IS_ERR() vs NULL check in probe
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 07:19:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220412041936.GK12805@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c7606920-b5c9-f8e3-3026-631a796c195a@samsung.com>
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 10:01:20AM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
> Hi Dan Carpenter.
>
> Same patch[1] was posted so I will pick it up.
>
> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg967488.html
>
It's not the same. That one returns -EINVAL and mine returns
-EPROBE_DEFER. I obvoiously thought that -EPROBE_DEFER was the correct
return but I wasn't positive. -EPROBE_DEFER is kind of a special
return so I think it matters to get this correct.
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-12 4:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20220408102327epcas1p409b13bf2da7e19b0a24571ce50e3ea92@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2022-04-08 10:21 ` [PATCH] drm/exynos: fix IS_ERR() vs NULL check in probe Dan Carpenter
2022-04-12 1:01 ` Inki Dae
2022-04-12 4:19 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2022-04-20 8:08 ` Inki Dae
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220412041936.GK12805@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=inki.dae@samsung.com \
--cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=jy0922.shim@samsung.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=robert.foss@linaro.org \
--cc=sw0312.kim@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).