dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
To: "Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	Nirmoy <nirmodas@amd.com>, "Nirmoy Das" <nirmoy.aiemd@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: thellstrom@vmware.com, airlied@linux.ie, kenny.ho@amd.com,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, nirmoy.das@amd.com,
	linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com, bskeggs@redhat.com,
	nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, alexander.deucher@amd.com,
	sean@poorly.run, kraxel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 19:37:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <31b0cac7-82c7-60ad-830b-66f7838a1047@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48a5e3e2-cb9d-8328-1529-3558601ba860@suse.de>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7462 bytes --]

Am 18.02.20 um 19:28 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> Hi
>
> Am 18.02.20 um 19:23 schrieb Christian König:
>> Am 18.02.20 um 19:16 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 18.02.20 um 18:13 schrieb Nirmoy:
>>>> On 2/18/20 1:44 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>>>> Am 18.02.20 um 13:40 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 17.02.20 um 16:04 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
>>>>>>> GPU address handling is device specific and should be handle by its
>>>>>>> device
>>>>>>> driver.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>     drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c    | 7 -------
>>>>>>>     include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h    | 2 --
>>>>>>>     include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 1 -
>>>>>>>     3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>> index 151edfd8de77..d5885cd609a3 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ static void ttm_mem_type_debug(struct
>>>>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct drm_printer *p
>>>>>>>         drm_printf(p, "    has_type: %d\n", man->has_type);
>>>>>>>         drm_printf(p, "    use_type: %d\n", man->use_type);
>>>>>>>         drm_printf(p, "    flags: 0x%08X\n", man->flags);
>>>>>>> -    drm_printf(p, "    gpu_offset: 0x%08llX\n", man->gpu_offset);
>>>>>>>         drm_printf(p, "    size: %llu\n", man->size);
>>>>>>>         drm_printf(p, "    available_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>>>> man->available_caching);
>>>>>>>         drm_printf(p, "    default_caching: 0x%08X\n",
>>>>>>> man->default_caching);
>>>>>>> @@ -345,12 +344,6 @@ static int ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(struct
>>>>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>>>>>     moved:
>>>>>>>         bo->evicted = false;
>>>>>>>     -    if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>>>>> -        bo->offset = (bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
>>>>>>> -            bdev->man[bo->mem.mem_type].gpu_offset;
>>>>>>> -    else
>>>>>>> -        bo->offset = 0;
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>> After moving this into users, the else branch has been lost. Is
>>>>>> 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true?
>>>>> At least for the amdgpu and radeon use cases, yes.
>>>>>
>>>>> But that is a rather good question I mean for it is illegal to get the
>>>>> GPU BO address if it is inaccessible (e.g. in the system domain).
>>>>>
>>>>> Could be that some driver relied on the behavior to get 0 for the
>>>>> system domain here.
>>>> I wonder how to verify that ?
>>>>
>>>> If I understand correctly:
>>>>
>>>> 1 qxl uses bo->offset only in qxl_bo_physical_address() which is not in
>>>> system domain.
>>>>
>>>> 2 unfortunately I can't say the same for bochs but it works with this
>>>> patch series so I think bochs is fine as well.
>>>>
>>>> 3 vmwgfx uses bo->offset only when bo->mem.mem_type == TTM_PL_VRAM so
>>>> vmwgfx should be fine.
>>>>
>>>> 4 amdgpu and radeon runs with 'bo->mem.mm_node' always true
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure about  nouveau as bo->offset is being used in many places.
>>>>
>>>> I could probably mirror the removed logic to nouveau as
>>> I suggest to introduce a ttm helper that contains the original branching
>>> and use it everywhere. Something like
>>>
>>>     s64 ttm_bo_offset(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
>>>     {
>>>        if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->mem.mm_node))
>>>            return 0;
>>>        return bo->mem.start << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>     }
>>>
>>> Could be static inline. The warning should point to broken drivers. This
>>> also gets rid of the ugly shift in the drivers.
>> Big NAK on this. That is exactly what we should NOT do.
>>
>> See the shift belongs into the driver, because it is driver dependent if
>> we work with page or byte offsets.
>>
>> For amdgpu we for example want to work with byte offsets and TTM should
>> not make any assumption about what bo->mem.start actually contains.
> OK. What about something like ttm_bo_pg_offset()? Same code without the
> shift. Would also make it clear that it's a page offset.

That is a rather good idea. We could name that ttm_bo_man_offset() and 
put it into ttm_bo_manager.c next to the manager which allocates them.

It's just that this manager is not used by everybody, so amdgpu, radeon 
and nouveau would still need a separate function.

Christian.

>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>> index f8015e0318d7..5a6a2af91318 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
>>>> @@ -1317,6 +1317,10 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object
>>>> *bo, bool evict,
>>>>                   list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>>>>                           nouveau_vma_map(vma, mem);
>>>>                   }
>>>> +               if (bo->mem.mm_node)
>>>> +                       nvbo->offset = (new_reg->start << PAGE_SHIFT);
>>>> +               else
>>>> +                       nvbo->offset = 0;
>>>>           } else {
>>>>                   list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
>>>>                           WARN_ON(ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false));
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Nirmoy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         ctx->bytes_moved += bo->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>>>>         return 0;
>>>>>>>     diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>> index b9bc1b00142e..d6f39ee5bf5d 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>> @@ -213,8 +213,6 @@ struct ttm_buffer_object {
>>>>>>>          * either of these locks held.
>>>>>>>          */
>>>>>>>     -    uint64_t offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>>>> word size */
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>         struct sg_table *sg;
>>>>>>>     };
>>>>>>>     diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>> index c9e0fd09f4b2..c8ce6c181abe 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
>>>>>>> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ struct ttm_mem_type_manager {
>>>>>>>         bool has_type;
>>>>>>>         bool use_type;
>>>>>>>         uint32_t flags;
>>>>>>> -    uint64_t gpu_offset; /* GPU address space is independent of CPU
>>>>>>> word size */
>>>>>>>         uint64_t size;
>>>>>>>         uint32_t available_caching;
>>>>>>>         uint32_t default_caching;
>>>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 9757 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-18 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-17 15:04 [PATCH 0/8] do not store GPU address in TTM Nirmoy Das
2020-02-17 15:04 ` [PATCH 1/8] drm/amdgpu: move ttm bo->offset to amdgpu_bo Nirmoy Das
2020-02-17 15:04 ` [PATCH 2/8] drm/radeon: don't use ttm bo->offset Nirmoy Das
2020-02-17 15:04 ` [PATCH 3/8] drm/vmwgfx: " Nirmoy Das
2020-02-17 15:04 ` [PATCH 4/8] drm/nouveau: " Nirmoy Das
2020-02-17 15:57   ` Alex Deucher
2020-02-17 16:04     ` Nirmoy
2020-02-17 15:04 ` [PATCH 5/8] drm/qxl: " Nirmoy Das
2020-02-17 15:04 ` [PATCH 6/8] drm/vram-helper: " Nirmoy Das
2020-02-24  8:01   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-02-24  9:52     ` Nirmoy
2020-02-17 15:04 ` [PATCH 7/8] drm/bochs: use drm_gem_vram_offset to get bo offset Nirmoy Das
2020-02-17 15:06   ` Christian König
2020-02-24  8:01   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-02-17 15:04 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses Nirmoy Das
2020-02-18 12:40   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-02-18 12:44     ` Christian König
2020-02-18 17:13       ` Nirmoy
2020-02-18 17:23         ` Christian König
2020-02-18 18:16         ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-02-18 18:23           ` Christian König
2020-02-18 18:28             ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-02-18 18:37               ` Christian König [this message]
2020-02-18 19:06                 ` [Nouveau] " Daniel Vetter
2020-02-19 12:47                   ` Nirmoy
2020-02-18 18:30           ` Nirmoy
2020-02-24  8:04         ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-02-24  9:59           ` Nirmoy
2020-02-18 12:42 ` [PATCH 0/8] do not store GPU address in TTM Thomas Zimmermann
2020-02-18 15:57   ` Nirmoy
2020-02-19 13:53 [PATCH v3 " Nirmoy Das
2020-02-19 13:53 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses Nirmoy Das
2020-03-05 13:29 [PATCH v4 0/8] do not store GPU address in TTM Nirmoy Das
2020-03-05 13:29 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses Nirmoy Das
2020-03-05 13:34   ` Christian König
2020-04-01 18:42 [PATCH v5 0/8] do not store GPU address in TTM Nirmoy Das
2020-04-01 18:42 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses Nirmoy Das
2020-06-24 18:26 [RESEND] [PATCH v6 0/8] do not store GPU address in TTM Nirmoy Das
2020-06-24 18:26 ` [PATCH 8/8] drm/ttm: do not keep GPU dependent addresses Nirmoy Das

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=31b0cac7-82c7-60ad-830b-66f7838a1047@gmail.com \
    --to=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kenny.ho@amd.com \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com \
    --cc=nirmodas@amd.com \
    --cc=nirmoy.aiemd@gmail.com \
    --cc=nirmoy.das@amd.com \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    --cc=thellstrom@vmware.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).