dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Cc: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>,
	airlied@linux.ie, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, wens@csie.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, treding@nvidia.com,
	Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com>,
	Marjan Pascolo <marjan.pascolo@trexom.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/sun4i: tcon: improve DCLK polarity handling
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 15:34:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <35622307-5e88-a2ed-bdf9-fca6554efefc@benettiengineering.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210108092355.7p5uakxt7lpdu3bn@gilmour>

Hi,

On 1/8/21 10:23 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for those patches
> 
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 03:30:32AM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
>> From: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com>
>>
>> It turned out(Maxime suggestion) that bit 26 of SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_REG is
>> dedicated to invert DCLK polarity and this makes thing really easier than
>> before. So let's handle DCLK polarity by adding
>> SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_DCLK_POSITIVE as bit 26 and activating according to
>> bus_flags the same way is done for all the other signals.
>>
>> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
> 
> Suggested-by would be nice here :)

Ok, didn't know about this tag

>> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c | 20 +-------------------
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.h |  1 +
>>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
>> index 52598bb0fb0b..30171ccd87e5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
>> @@ -569,26 +569,8 @@ static void sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_rgb(struct sun4i_tcon *tcon,
>>   	if (info->bus_flags & DRM_BUS_FLAG_DE_LOW)
>>   		val |= SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_DE_NEGATIVE;
>>   
>> -	/*
>> -	 * On A20 and similar SoCs, the only way to achieve Positive Edge
>> -	 * (Rising Edge), is setting dclk clock phase to 2/3(240°).
>> -	 * By default TCON works in Negative Edge(Falling Edge),
>> -	 * this is why phase is set to 0 in that case.
>> -	 * Unfortunately there's no way to logically invert dclk through
>> -	 * IO_POL register.
>> -	 * The only acceptable way to work, triple checked with scope,
>> -	 * is using clock phase set to 0° for Negative Edge and set to 240°
>> -	 * for Positive Edge.
>> -	 * On A33 and similar SoCs there would be a 90° phase option,
>> -	 * but it divides also dclk by 2.
>> -	 * Following code is a way to avoid quirks all around TCON
>> -	 * and DOTCLOCK drivers.
>> -	 */
>>   	if (info->bus_flags & DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_DRIVE_POSEDGE)
>> -		clk_set_phase(tcon->dclk, 0);
>> -
>> -	if (info->bus_flags & DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_DRIVE_NEGEDGE)
>> -		clk_set_phase(tcon->dclk, 240);
>> +		val |= SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_DCLK_POSITIVE;
> 
> I'm not really sure why we need the first patch of this series here?

The idea was to have 2 for testing, 1st one is already applicable, while 
the other must be tested, but I can send only one with no problem.

> That patch only seem to undo what you did in patch 1

No, it doesn't, the 2nd one change the way it achieve the same thing, 
because the 1st swap DCLK phase, while the 2nd uses the IO_POL bit to 
set IO polarity according to bus_flags.

Best Regards
-- 
Giulio Benetti
Benetti Engineering sas
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-09 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-06 19:27 [PATCH 0/2] drm/sun4i: fix DCLK and improve its handling Giulio Benetti
2021-01-06 19:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/sun4i: tcon: fix inverted DCLK polarity Giulio Benetti
2021-01-06 21:00   ` Jernej Škrabec
2021-01-07  2:30     ` [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/sun4i: fix DCLK and improve its handling Giulio Benetti
2021-01-07  2:30       ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/sun4i: tcon: fix inverted DCLK polarity Giulio Benetti
2021-01-07  2:30       ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/sun4i: tcon: improve DCLK polarity handling Giulio Benetti
2021-01-08  9:23         ` Maxime Ripard
2021-01-08  9:32           ` Marjan Pascolo
2021-01-08 14:46             ` Giulio Benetti
2021-01-08 14:34           ` Giulio Benetti [this message]
2021-01-11 17:20             ` Maxime Ripard
2021-01-11 17:37               ` Giulio Benetti
2021-01-11 17:46               ` [PATCH v3] drm/sun4i: tcon: fix inverted DCLK polarity Giulio Benetti
2021-01-13  9:42                 ` Maxime Ripard
2021-01-13 10:47                   ` [PATCH v4] " Giulio Benetti
2021-01-13 16:05                     ` [PATCH v5] " Giulio Benetti
2021-01-14  1:32                       ` kernel test robot
2021-01-14  7:58                       ` Marjan Pascolo
2021-01-14  8:12                         ` Giulio Benetti
2021-01-14  8:17                         ` [PATCH v6] " Giulio Benetti
2021-01-14 11:40                           ` Marjan Pascolo
2021-01-14 11:42                           ` Maxime Ripard
2021-02-10 16:22                             ` [PATCH] pinctrl/sunxi: adding input-debounce-ns property Marjan Pascolo
2021-02-17 11:03                               ` Maxime Ripard
2021-02-26 12:53                                 ` Marjan Pascolo
2021-03-04 15:51                                   ` Maxime Ripard
2021-01-13 10:48                   ` [PATCH v3] drm/sun4i: tcon: fix inverted DCLK polarity Giulio Benetti
2021-01-06 19:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/sun4i: tcon: improve DCLK polarity handling Giulio Benetti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=35622307-5e88-a2ed-bdf9-fca6554efefc@benettiengineering.com \
    --to=giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@siol.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marjan.pascolo@trexom.it \
    --cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).