dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-imx@nxp.com
Cc: nm@ti.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	viresh.kumar@linaro.org, liviu.dudau@arm.com,
	bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, bsegall@google.com,
	Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com, amit.kucheria@verdurent.com,
	lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	khilman@kernel.org, steven.price@arm.com, cw00.choi@samsung.com,
	mingo@redhat.com, mgorman@suse.de, rui.zhang@intel.com,
	alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com, orjan.eide@arm.com,
	b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
	Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com, airlied@linux.ie, javi.merino@arm.com,
	tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com, qperret@google.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
	mka@chromium.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	agross@kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
	patrick.bellasi@matbug.net, shawnguo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] OPP: refactor dev_pm_opp_of_register_em() and update related drivers
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 18:21:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ee5dc1a-fdfe-da17-9a62-a5182c1f4d3e@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200318114548.19916-3-lukasz.luba@arm.com>

On 18/03/2020 12:45, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> The Energy Model framework supports both: CPUs and devfreq devices. Drop
> the CPU specific interface with cpumask and add struct device. Add also a
> return value. This new interface provides easy way to create a simple
> Energy Model, which then might be used in i.e. thermal subsystem.

This patch contains too many different changes.

There are fixes and traces added in addition to a function prototype change.

Please provide patches separated by logical changes.

If the cpumask is extracted in the underlying function
em_register_perf_domain() as suggested in the previous patch 1/5,
dev_pm_opp_of_register_em() can be struct device centric only.

> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c           |  2 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c        |  2 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c     |  2 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c         |  2 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c      |  2 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c         |  2 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c |  2 +-
>  drivers/opp/of.c                       | 71 ++++++++++++++++----------
>  include/linux/pm_opp.h                 | 15 +++++-
>  9 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
> index 26fe8dfb9ce6..f9f03fd49b83 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
> @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  	policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = transition_latency;
>  	policy->dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu = true;
>  
> -	dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(policy->cpus);
> +	dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(cpu_dev, policy->cpus);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> index 285b8e9aa185..9764abf17ce3 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
> @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static int imx6q_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  	policy->clk = clks[ARM].clk;
>  	cpufreq_generic_init(policy, freq_table, transition_latency);
>  	policy->suspend_freq = max_freq;
> -	dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(policy->cpus);
> +	dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(cpu_dev, policy->cpus);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> index 0c98dd08273d..7d1212c9b7c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
> @@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ static int mtk_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  	policy->driver_data = info;
>  	policy->clk = info->cpu_clk;
>  
> -	dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(policy->cpus);
> +	dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(info->cpu_dev, policy->cpus);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c
> index 8d14b42a8c6f..3694bb030df3 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c
> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static int omap_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  
>  	/* FIXME: what's the actual transition time? */
>  	cpufreq_generic_init(policy, freq_table, 300 * 1000);
> -	dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(policy->cpus);
> +	dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(mpu_dev, policy->cpus);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> index fc92a8842e25..0a04b6f03b9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  		goto error;
>  	}
>  
> -	dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(policy->cpus);
> +	dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(cpu_dev, policy->cpus);
>  
>  	policy->fast_switch_possible = true;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
> index 20d1f85d5f5a..b0f5388b8854 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static int scpi_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  
>  	policy->fast_switch_possible = false;
>  
> -	dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(policy->cpus);
> +	dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(cpu_dev, policy->cpus);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c
> index 83c85d3d67e3..4e8b1dee7c9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c
> @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static int ve_spc_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  	policy->freq_table = freq_table[cur_cluster];
>  	policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 1000000; /* 1 ms */
>  
> -	dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(policy->cpus);
> +	dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(cpu_dev, policy->cpus);
>  
>  	if (is_bL_switching_enabled())
>  		per_cpu(cpu_last_req_freq, policy->cpu) =
> diff --git a/drivers/opp/of.c b/drivers/opp/of.c
> index 0efd6cf6d023..f94d095113e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/opp/of.c
> +++ b/drivers/opp/of.c
> @@ -1036,18 +1036,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_get_of_node);
>  
>  /*
>   * Callback function provided to the Energy Model framework upon registration.
> - * This computes the power estimated by @CPU at @kHz if it is the frequency
> + * This computes the power estimated by @dev at @kHz if it is the frequency
>   * of an existing OPP, or at the frequency of the first OPP above @kHz otherwise
>   * (see dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil()). This function updates @kHz to the ceiled
>   * frequency and @mW to the associated power. The power is estimated as
> - * P = C * V^2 * f with C being the CPU's capacitance and V and f respectively
> - * the voltage and frequency of the OPP.
> + * P = C * V^2 * f with C being the device's capacitance and V and f
> + * respectively the voltage and frequency of the OPP.
>   *
> - * Returns -ENODEV if the CPU device cannot be found, -EINVAL if the power
> - * calculation failed because of missing parameters, 0 otherwise.
> + * Returns -EINVAL if the power calculation failed because of missing
> + * parameters, 0 otherwise.
>   */
> -static int __maybe_unused _get_cpu_power(unsigned long *mW, unsigned long *kHz,
> -					 struct device *cpu_dev)
> +static int __maybe_unused _get_power(unsigned long *mW, unsigned long *kHz,
> +				     struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
>  	struct device_node *np;
> @@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused _get_cpu_power(unsigned long *mW, unsigned long *kHz,
>  	u64 tmp;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	np = of_node_get(cpu_dev->of_node);
> +	np = of_node_get(dev->of_node);
>  	if (!np)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> @@ -1066,7 +1066,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused _get_cpu_power(unsigned long *mW, unsigned long *kHz,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	Hz = *kHz * 1000;
> -	opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(cpu_dev, &Hz);
> +	opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(dev, &Hz);
>  	if (IS_ERR(opp))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> @@ -1086,30 +1086,38 @@ static int __maybe_unused _get_cpu_power(unsigned long *mW, unsigned long *kHz,
>  
>  /**
>   * dev_pm_opp_of_register_em() - Attempt to register an Energy Model
> - * @cpus	: CPUs for which an Energy Model has to be registered
> + * @dev		: Device for which an Energy Model has to be registered
> + * @cpus	: CPUs for which an Energy Model has to be registered. For
> + *		other type of devices it should be set to NULL.
>   *
>   * This checks whether the "dynamic-power-coefficient" devicetree property has
>   * been specified, and tries to register an Energy Model with it if it has.
> + * Having this property means the voltages are known for OPPs and the EM
> + * might be calculated.
>   */
> -void dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(struct cpumask *cpus)
> +int dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(struct device *dev, struct cpumask *cpus)
>  {
> -	struct em_data_callback em_cb = EM_DATA_CB(_get_cpu_power);
> -	int ret, nr_opp, cpu = cpumask_first(cpus);
> -	struct device *cpu_dev;
> +	struct em_data_callback em_cb = EM_DATA_CB(_get_power);
>  	struct device_node *np;
> +	int ret, nr_opp;
>  	u32 cap;
>  
> -	cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
> -	if (!cpu_dev)
> -		return;
> +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev)) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto failed;
> +	}
>  
> -	nr_opp = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(cpu_dev);
> -	if (nr_opp <= 0)
> -		return;
> +	nr_opp = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(dev);
> +	if (nr_opp <= 0) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto failed;
> +	}
>  
> -	np = of_node_get(cpu_dev->of_node);
> -	if (!np)
> -		return;
> +	np = of_node_get(dev->of_node);
> +	if (!np) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto failed;
> +	}
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Register an EM only if the 'dynamic-power-coefficient' property is
> @@ -1120,9 +1128,20 @@ void dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(struct cpumask *cpus)
>  	 */
>  	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "dynamic-power-coefficient", &cap);
>  	of_node_put(np);
> -	if (ret || !cap)
> -		return;
> +	if (ret || !cap) {
> +		dev_dbg(dev, "Couldn't find proper 'dynamic-power-coefficient' in DT\n");
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto failed;
> +	}
>  
> -	em_register_perf_domain(cpu_dev, nr_opp, &em_cb, cpus);
> +	ret = em_register_perf_domain(dev, nr_opp, &em_cb, cpus);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto failed;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +failed:
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "Couldn't register Energy Model %d\n", ret);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_of_register_em);
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_opp.h b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> index 747861816f4f..822ff9f52bf7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  #ifndef __LINUX_OPP_H__
>  #define __LINUX_OPP_H__
>  
> +#include <linux/energy_model.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/notifier.h>
>  
> @@ -360,7 +361,11 @@ int dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus(struct device *cpu_dev, struct cpumask *cpuma
>  struct device_node *dev_pm_opp_of_get_opp_desc_node(struct device *dev);
>  struct device_node *dev_pm_opp_get_of_node(struct dev_pm_opp *opp);
>  int of_get_required_opp_performance_state(struct device_node *np, int index);
> -void dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(struct cpumask *cpus);
> +int dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(struct device *dev, struct cpumask *cpus);
> +static inline void dev_pm_opp_of_unregister_em(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	em_unregister_perf_domain(dev);
> +}
>  #else
>  static inline int dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(struct device *dev)
>  {
> @@ -400,7 +405,13 @@ static inline struct device_node *dev_pm_opp_get_of_node(struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static inline void dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(struct cpumask *cpus)
> +static inline int dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(struct device *dev,
> +					    struct cpumask *cpus)
> +{
> +	return -ENOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void dev_pm_opp_of_unregister_em(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  }
>  
> 


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-06  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-18 11:45 [PATCH v5 0/5] Add support for devices in the Energy Model Lukasz Luba
2020-03-18 11:45 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] PM / EM: add devices to " Lukasz Luba
2020-04-03 16:05   ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-06 13:29     ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-06 14:58       ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-06 16:07         ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-06 21:17           ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-07  9:32             ` Lukasz Luba
2020-03-18 11:45 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] OPP: refactor dev_pm_opp_of_register_em() and update related drivers Lukasz Luba
2020-04-01  7:19   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-03 16:21   ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2020-04-06 14:05     ` Lukasz Luba
2020-03-18 11:45 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] thermal: devfreq_cooling: Use PM QoS to set frequency limits Lukasz Luba
2020-04-03 16:43   ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-03 17:18     ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2020-04-03 17:19       ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-03-18 11:45 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] thermal: devfreq_cooling: Refactor code and switch to use Energy Model Lukasz Luba
2020-04-01 10:49   ` Lukasz Luba
2020-04-03 17:44   ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-04-06 13:35     ` Lukasz Luba
2020-03-18 11:45 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] drm/panfrost: Register devfreq cooling and attempt to add " Lukasz Luba
2020-03-18 13:11   ` Alyssa Rosenzweig
2020-03-23 13:50     ` Lukasz Luba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3ee5dc1a-fdfe-da17-9a62-a5182c1f4d3e@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com \
    --cc=amit.kucheria@verdurent.com \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=javi.merino@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=orjan.eide@arm.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@matbug.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).