From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: [PULL] drm-intel-next
Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 22:04:17 +0200
Message-ID: <53694041.6010409@t-online.de>
References: <20140428132613.GA2368@phenom.ffwll.local>
 <5368DED4.5050401@t-online.de> <87k39zqbju.fsf@intel.com>
 <20140506185210.GA5730@phenom.ffwll.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140506185210.GA5730@phenom.ffwll.local>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
 <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "Intel-gfx" <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

On 06.05.2014 20:59, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:30:45PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Tue, 06 May 2014, Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de> wrote:
>>> On 28.04.2014 15:26, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> The patch below is a clear candidate for 3.15 as it fixes a regression introduced after 3.14
>>>> Egbert Eich (1):
>>>>         drm/i915/SDVO: For sysfs link put directory and target in correct order
>> Daniel, want me to pick that for -fixes?
> Yeah I geuss so. People never complained that the link isn't there, us
> adding it for one kernel release to the wrong place doesn't really sound
> too bothersome.
>
> But if this unbreaks a system somewhere then it makes sense to apply to
> -fixes.
>
> Knut, how exactly does your system blow up?
Well, it's only the warning generated at boot time that would irritate users.
As a patch is known and tested it's probably a good idea to fix it before
people complain to lkml and bugzilla.

cu,
  Knut
> -Daniel