From: Werner Sembach <wse@tuxedocomputers.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Cc: sunpeng.li@amd.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
airlied@linux.ie, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
tzimmermann@suse.de, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
alexander.deucher@amd.com, christian.koenig@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/uAPI: Add "active bpc" as feedback channel for "max bpc" drm property
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 10:00:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55a45d9e-9784-0288-fc1f-144f99dc6c19@tuxedocomputers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210607074037.oxm7qbhcx7gsg6yd@gilmour>
Am 07.06.21 um 09:40 schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 07:17:21PM +0200, Werner Sembach wrote:
>> Add a new general drm property "active bpc" which can be used by graphic drivers
>> to report the applied bit depth per pixel back to userspace.
> Just a heads up, we'll need an open source project that has accepted it
> before merging it.
>
> See https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/gpu/drm-uapi.html#open-source-userspace-requirements
Yes, I know.
>
>> While "max bpc" can be used to change the color depth, there was no way to check
>> which one actually got used. While in theory the driver chooses the best/highest
>> color depth within the max bpc setting a user might not be fully aware what his
>> hardware is or isn't capable off. This is meant as a quick way to double check
>> the setup.
>>
>> In the future, automatic color calibration for screens might also depend on this
>> information available.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Werner Sembach <wse@tuxedocomputers.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c | 2 ++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/drm/drm_connector.h | 15 ++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
>> index 268bb69c2e2f..7ae4e40936b5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c
>> @@ -873,6 +873,8 @@ drm_atomic_connector_get_property(struct drm_connector *connector,
>> *val = 0;
>> } else if (property == connector->max_bpc_property) {
>> *val = state->max_requested_bpc;
>> + } else if (property == connector->active_bpc_property) {
>> + *val = state->active_bpc;
>> } else if (connector->funcs->atomic_get_property) {
>> return connector->funcs->atomic_get_property(connector,
>> state, property, val);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
>> index 7631f76e7f34..5f42a5be5822 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
>> @@ -1195,6 +1195,13 @@ static const struct drm_prop_enum_list dp_colorspaces[] = {
>> * drm_connector_attach_max_bpc_property() to create and attach the
>> * property to the connector during initialization.
>> *
>> + * active bpc:
>> + * This read-only range property is used by userspace check the bit depth
>> + * actually applied by the GPU driver after evaluation all hardware
> ^ display
>
> Depending on the system, the display component might have a GPU attached
> or not, and the GPU might have a display component or not.
Ok, I try to bee more clear in the wording
>
>> + * capabilities and max bpc. Drivers to use the function
>> + * drm_connector_attach_active_bpc_property() to create and attach the
>> + * property to the connector during initialization.
>> + *
>> * Connectors also have one standardized atomic property:
>> *
>> * CRTC_ID:
>> @@ -2150,6 +2157,39 @@ int drm_connector_attach_max_bpc_property(struct drm_connector *connector,
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_connector_attach_max_bpc_property);
>>
>> +/**
>> + * drm_connector_attach_active_bpc_property - attach "active bpc" property
>> + * @connector: connector to attach active bpc property on.
>> + * @min: The minimum bit depth supported by the connector.
>> + * @max: The maximum bit depth supported by the connector.
>> + *
>> + * This is used to check the applied bit depth on a connector.
>> + *
>> + * Returns:
>> + * Zero on success, negative errno on failure.
>> + */
>> +int drm_connector_attach_active_bpc_property(struct drm_connector *connector,
>> + int min, int max)
>> +{
>> + struct drm_device *dev = connector->dev;
>> + struct drm_property *prop;
>> +
>> + prop = connector->active_bpc_property;
>> + if (!prop) {
>> + prop = drm_property_create_range(dev, 0, "active bpc", min, max);
>> + if (!prop)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + connector->active_bpc_property = prop;
>> + }
>> +
>> + drm_object_attach_property(&connector->base, prop, 0);
>> + connector->state->active_bpc = 0;
> I guess we want to default to 8?
>
> Maxime
The default state should only be active when no display is connected or
the display is off, so I thought 0 makes more sense, as no active
display = no active bpc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-07 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-04 17:17 [PATCH 0/4] Add "activ bpc" drm property and use it in AMD and Intel driver Werner Sembach
2021-06-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/amd/display: Add missing cases convert_dc_color_depth_into_bpc Werner Sembach
2021-06-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/uAPI: Add "active bpc" as feedback channel for "max bpc" drm property Werner Sembach
2021-06-04 17:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-06-07 6:46 ` Werner Sembach
2021-06-08 6:12 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-06-07 7:40 ` Maxime Ripard
2021-06-07 8:00 ` Werner Sembach [this message]
2021-06-07 7:52 ` Pekka Paalanen
2021-06-07 8:53 ` Werner Sembach
2021-06-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/amd/display: Add handling for new "active bpc" property Werner Sembach
2021-06-04 17:17 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/display: " Werner Sembach
2021-06-04 17:30 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-06-07 6:47 ` Werner Sembach
2021-06-07 20:33 ` Werner Sembach
2021-06-08 17:19 ` Werner Sembach
2021-06-10 14:29 ` Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55a45d9e-9784-0288-fc1f-144f99dc6c19@tuxedocomputers.com \
--to=wse@tuxedocomputers.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=sunpeng.li@amd.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).