From: Tomi Valkeinen <email@example.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] omapfb: Remove unused writeback code
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 15:56:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> (raw)
On 13/03/2020 15:38, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Tomi,
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 03:30:15PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> On 13/03/2020 15:22, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 02:24:10PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>>>> Remove unused writeback code. This code will never be used, as omapfb is
>>>> being deprecated.
>>> I'm fine with that, but out of curiosity, is there any particular reason
>>> to remove that code now instead of letting omapfb bitrot slowly ?
>> It conflicts with tidss's writeback code in TI kernel, when compiling tidss and omapfb into the
>> kernel. I thought this is the easiest way to resolve that, as all the removed code is dead code,
>> instead of trying to invent new names in tidss for a lot of functions.
>> Probably the functions in tidss still could use some renaming in the future, but I didn't want to be
>> forced to do that because of omapfb's dead code...
> Could you do both ? :-) It's not good using too generic names in tidss.
> You can just prefix the functions with tidss_. There's a risk of
> conflict with omapdrm too if the names are too generic.
I will, but I didn't want to start doing that right now. tidss has just been merged to mainline, and
tidss is still under active development, so doing such a change is an invitation to conflicts. I'd
like things to settle down a bit first.
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
dri-devel mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-13 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20200313122425eucas1p16b0df0e1a4b81fb9abb4a9c28fdf4fff@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2020-03-13 12:24 ` [PATCH] omapfb: Remove unused writeback code Tomi Valkeinen
2020-03-13 13:22 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-03-13 13:30 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2020-03-13 13:38 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-03-13 13:56 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2020-03-20 13:43 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).