dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] drm: Support simple-framebuffer devices and firmware fbs
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 11:13:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <74765a16-34f2-329a-3991-0a431abd6ff4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uHd7_uR9U9B2x=9cxJ_eowNZ67RoxcJ-0vt8QvCSK=h5w@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On 6/30/20 11:06 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:39 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 6/25/20 2:00 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>>> This patchset adds support for simple-framebuffer platform devices and
>>> a handover mechanism for native drivers to take-over control of the
>>> hardware.
>>>
>>> The new driver, called simplekms, binds to a simple-frambuffer platform
>>> device. The kernel's boot code creates such devices for firmware-provided
>>> framebuffers, such as EFI-GOP or VESA. Typically the BIOS, UEFI or boot
>>> loader sets up the framebuffers. Description via device tree is also an
>>> option.
>>>
>>> Simplekms is small enough to be linked into the kernel. The driver's main
>>> purpose is to provide graphical output during the early phases of the boot
>>> process, before the native DRM drivers are available. Native drivers are
>>> typically loaded from an initrd ram disk. Occationally simplekms can also
>>> serve as interim solution on graphics hardware without native DRM driver.
>>
>> Cool, thank you for doing this, this is a very welcome change,
>> but ... (see below).
>>
>>> So far distributions rely on fbdev drivers, such as efifb, vesafb or
>>> simplefb, for early-boot graphical output. However fbdev is deprecated and
>>> the drivers do not provide DRM interfaces for modern userspace.
>>>
>>> Patches 1 and 2 prepare the DRM format helpers for simplekms.
>>>
>>> Patches 3 to 7 add the simplekms driver. It's build on simple DRM helpers
>>> and SHMEM. It supports 16-bit, 24-bit and 32-bit RGB framebuffers. During
>>> pageflips, SHMEM buffers are copied into the framebuffer memory, similar
>>> to cirrus or mgag200. The code in patches 6 and 7 handles clocks and
>>> regulators. It's based on the simplefb drivers, but has been modified for
>>> DRM.
>>>
>>> Patches 8 and 9 add a hand-over mechanism. Simplekms acquires it's
>>> framebuffer's I/O-memory range and provides a callback function to be
>>> removed by a native driver. The native driver will remove simplekms before
>>> taking over the hardware. The removal is integrated into existing helpers,
>>> so drivers use it automatically.
>>>
>>> I tested simplekms with x86 EFI and VESA framebuffers, which both work
>>> reliably. The fbdev console and Weston work automatically. Xorg requires
>>> manual configuration of the device. Xorgs current modesetting driver does
>>> not work with both, platform and PCI device, for the same physical
>>> hardware. Once configured, X11 works.
>>
>> Ugh, Xorg not working OOTB is a bit of a showstopper, we cannot just go
>> around and break userspace. OTOH this does seem like an userspace issue
>> and not something which we can (or should try to) fix in the kernel.
>>
>> I guess the solution will have to be to have this default to N for now
>> in Kconfig and clearly mention in the Kconfig help text that this needs
>> a fixed Xorg modesetting driver before it can be enabled.
>>
>> Any chance you have time to work on fixing the Xorg modesetting driver
>> so that this will just work with the standard Xorg autoconfiguration
>> stuff?
> 
> Hm, why do we even have both platform and pci drivers visible at the
> same time? I thought the point of this is that simplekms is built-in,
> then initrd loads the real drm driver, and by the time Xorg is
> running, simplekms should be long gone.
> 
> Maybe a few more details of what's going wrong and why to help unconfuse me?

I guess that Thomas deliberately disabled the normal kms driver to test this.

Still we should make sure that this (Xorg on simpledrm) works, a user might
see this because of running an older kernel with a newer GPU, or when
using the nvidia binary and thus having nouveau disabled and then installing
a newer kernel which breaks the dkms nvidia module building because of API
changes.

Regards,

Hans

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-30  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-25 12:00 [RFC][PATCH 0/9] drm: Support simple-framebuffer devices and firmware fbs Thomas Zimmermann
2020-06-25 12:00 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/format-helper: Pass destination pitch to drm_fb_memcpy_dstclip() Thomas Zimmermann
2020-06-29  8:40   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-25 14:55     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-09-26 16:42       ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-28  7:22         ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-09-28  8:53           ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-28  9:13             ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-09-29  9:19               ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-29  9:39                 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-09-29 11:32                   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-28 10:24             ` Gerd Hoffmann
2020-09-28 13:42               ` Pekka Paalanen
2020-06-25 12:00 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/format-helper: Add blitter functions Thomas Zimmermann
2020-06-29  8:46   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-06-25 12:00 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm: Add simplekms driver Thomas Zimmermann
2020-06-29  9:06   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-25 15:01     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-09-25 15:14       ` Maxime Ripard
2020-09-28  7:25         ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-02-10 16:14     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-06-25 12:00 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/simplekms: Add fbdev emulation Thomas Zimmermann
2020-06-29  9:11   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-06-25 12:00 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/simplekms: Initialize framebuffer data from device-tree node Thomas Zimmermann
2020-06-30  2:36   ` Rob Herring
2020-06-25 12:00 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/simplekms: Acquire clocks from DT device node Thomas Zimmermann
2020-06-25 13:34   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-06-29  9:07     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-06-25 12:00 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/simplekms: Acquire regulators " Thomas Zimmermann
2020-06-25 13:36   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-06-25 12:00 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm: Add infrastructure for platform devices Thomas Zimmermann
2020-06-29  9:27   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-28  8:40     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-09-28  8:50       ` Daniel Vetter
2020-09-28  9:14         ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-09-29  8:59     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-09-29  9:20       ` Daniel Vetter
2020-06-30  9:11   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-06-25 12:00 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/simplekms: Acquire memory aperture for framebuffer Thomas Zimmermann
2020-06-29  9:22   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-06-29 16:04     ` Greg KH
2020-06-29 16:23       ` Mark Brown
2020-06-29 16:57         ` Greg KH
2020-06-30  2:13       ` Rob Herring
2020-06-30  8:50         ` Greg KH
2020-06-29  9:38 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/9] drm: Support simple-framebuffer devices and firmware fbs Hans de Goede
2020-06-30  9:06   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-06-30  9:13     ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2020-07-01 14:10     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-07-03 10:55       ` Hans de Goede
2020-07-03 11:42         ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-07-03 12:58         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-07-03 14:11           ` Hans de Goede
2020-07-01 13:48   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2020-07-03 10:44     ` Hans de Goede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=74765a16-34f2-329a-3991-0a431abd6ff4@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).