dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Emma Anholt <emma@anholt.net>,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Raspberry Pi 3 Model B+ hangs in vc4_hdmi_runtime_resume()
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 20:45:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <790e6127-3f75-3565-0d5a-89cc12540f5a@i2se.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220927131517.3yyuswqlndcwr4pz@houat>

Hi Maxime,

Am 27.09.22 um 15:15 schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 02:25:12PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 01:42:40PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 01:12:35PM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>>>> Am 27.09.22 um 11:42 schrieb Maxime Ripard:
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 09:25:54AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 08:50:12PM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>>>>>>> Am 26.09.22 um 14:47 schrieb Maxime Ripard:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 02:40:48PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 26.09.2022 14:08:04, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Marc,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 26.09.22 um 12:21 schrieb Marc Kleine-Budde:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 22.09.2022 17:06:00, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm on a Raspberry Pi 3 Model B+ running current Debian testing ARM64,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> using Debian's v5.19 kernel (Debian's v5.18 was working flawless).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> | [    0.000000] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0000000000 [0x410fd034]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> | [    0.000000] Linux version 5.19.0-1-arm64 (debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-5) 11.3.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.38.90.20220713) #1 SMP Debian 5.19.6-1 (2022-0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9-01)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> | [    0.000000] Machine model: Raspberry Pi 3 Model B+
>>>>>>>>>>>>> | [    3.747500] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Attached to firmware from 2022-03-24T13:21:11
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> As soon a the vc4 module is loaded the following warnings hits 4
>>>>>>>>>>>>> times, then the machine stops.
>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The warning itself is fixed, both upstream and in stable (5.19.7).
>>>>>>>>>>> Ok. Debian is using 5.19.6
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It shouldn't have any relation to the hang though. Can you share your
>>>>>>>>>>>> setup?
>>>>>>>>>>> - config.txt:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8--------
>>>>>>>>>>> gpu_mem=16
>>>>>>>>>>> disable_splash=1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> arm_64bit=1
>>>>>>>>>>> enable_uart=1
>>>>>>>>>>> uart_2ndstage=1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> os_prefix=/u-boot/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [pi3]
>>>>>>>>>>> force_turbo=1
>>>>>>>>>>> -------->8-------->8-------->8-------->8--------
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> - Raspberry Pi 3 Model B+
>>>>>>>>>>> - no HDMI connected
>>>>>>>>>> Does it mean, the issue only occurs without HDMI connected?
>>>>>>>>>> If you didn't test with HDMI yet, could you please do?
>>>>>>>>> The error occurs with HDMI not connected, as vc4 is the gfx driver I
>>>>>>>>> thought this might be of interest. :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't have a HDMI monitor here, but I'll come back to you as soon as I
>>>>>>>>> get access to one (might take some time).
>>>>>>>> It's not the first time an issue like this one would occur. I'm trying
>>>>>>>> to make my Pi3 boot again, and will try to bisect the issue.
>>>>>>> yes the issue is only triggered without HDMI connected. I was able to
>>>>>>> reproduce with an older vc4 firmware from 2020 (don't want to upgrade yet).
>>>>>>> Kernel was also an arm64 build with defconfig.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here some rough starting point for bisection:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 5.18.0 good
>>>>>>> 5.19.0 bad
>>>>>>> 5.19.6 bad
>>>>>> Sorry it took a bit of time, it looks like I found another bug while
>>>>>> trying to test this yesterday.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your datapoints are interesting though. I have a custom configuration
>>>>>> and it does boot 5.19 without an HDMI connected.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I guess it leaves us with either the firmware version being different
>>>>>> (I'm using a newer version, from March 2022), or the configuration. I'll
>>>>>> test with defconfig.
>>>>> So it turns out compiling vc4 as a module is the culprit.
>>>> Do you mean regardless of the kernel version in your case?
>>> No, I mean that, with vc4 as a module, 5.18 works but 5.19 doesn't, like
>>> Marc said. But if vc4 is built in, both work.
>>>
>>>> In my test cases i build vc4 always as module.
>>>>
>>>>> It's not clear to me why at this point, but the first register write in
>>>>> vc4_hdmi_reset stalls.
>>>> Sounds like timing issue or a missing dependency (clock or power domain)
>>> It felt like a clock or power domain issue to me indeed, but adding
>>> clk_ignore_unused and pd_ignore_unused isn't enough, so it's probably
>>> something a bit more complicated than just the clock / PD being
>>> disabled.
>> I found the offending patch:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20220225143534.405820-13-maxime@cerno.tech/
>>
>> That code was removed because it was made irrelevant by that earlier patch:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20220225143534.405820-10-maxime@cerno.tech/
>>
>> But it turns out that while it works when the driver is built-in, it
>> doesn't when it's a module. If we add a clk_hw_get_rate() call right
>> after that call to raspberrypi_fw_set_rate(), the rate returned is 0.
>>
>> I'm not entirely sure why, but I wonder if it's related to:
>> https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/4962#issuecomment-1228593439
> Turns out it's not, since the Pi3 is using the clk-bcm2835 driver.

FWIW i can confirm, that i see the same behavior:

fd5894fa2413cca3e6a3ea713b2bd57281af2e86 bad

5b6ef06ea6225570bc0b33325306c7b8c6bdf5eb good

>
> However, even reverting that patch fails. clk_set_min_rate fails because
> the rate is protected, but it doesn't look like it is anywhere for that
> clock, so I'm a bit confused.
>
> Even if we do remove the clock protection check in
> clk_core_set_rate_nolock(), clk_calc_new_rates() will then fail because
> the bcm2835 driver will round the clock rate below the minimum, which is
> rejected.
>
> I'm not entirely sure what to do at this point. I guess the proper fix
> would be to:
>    - Figure out why it's considered protected when it's not (or shouldn't be)
>    - Make the driver compute an acceptable rate for that clock
>    - Reintroduce the clk_set_min_rate call to HDMI's runtime_resume, or
>      some other equivalent code
>
> Maxime

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-27 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-22 14:54 Raspberry Pi 3 Model B+ hangs in vc4_hdmi_runtime_resume() Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-09-22 15:06 ` Maxime Ripard
2022-09-26 10:21   ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-09-26 12:08     ` Stefan Wahren
2022-09-26 12:40       ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-09-26 12:47         ` Maxime Ripard
2022-09-26 18:50           ` Stefan Wahren
2022-09-27  7:25             ` Maxime Ripard
2022-09-27  8:56               ` Stefan Wahren
2022-09-27  9:42               ` Maxime Ripard
2022-09-27 11:12                 ` Stefan Wahren
2022-09-27 11:36                   ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-09-27 11:42                   ` Maxime Ripard
2022-09-27 12:25                     ` Maxime Ripard
2022-09-27 13:15                       ` Maxime Ripard
2022-09-27 13:35                         ` Maxime Ripard
2022-09-27 18:45                         ` Stefan Wahren [this message]
2022-09-27 18:47                           ` Info Skymem
2022-09-29  9:35                         ` Maxime Ripard
2022-09-29 13:46                           ` Stefan Wahren
2022-09-29 14:15                             ` Maxime Ripard
2022-09-22 16:19 ` Stefan Wahren
2022-09-27  7:51 ` Raspberry Pi 3 Model B+ hangs in vc4_hdmi_runtime_resume() #forregzbot Thorsten Leemhuis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=790e6127-3f75-3565-0d5a-89cc12540f5a@i2se.com \
    --to=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=emma@anholt.net \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).