From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
"Karol Herbst" <kherbst@redhat.com>, Lyude <lyude@redhat.com>,
"Daniel Dadap" <ddadap@nvidia.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"Mark Gross" <markgross@kernel.org>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] ACPI: video: Add a native function parameter to acpi_video_get_backlight_type()
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 12:02:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmk9dhe1.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dc30ddc2-b00e-234e-5ec3-b1ea79c74082@redhat.com>
On Wed, 18 May 2022, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 5/18/22 10:55, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 May 2022, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> ATM on x86 laptops where we want userspace to use the acpi_video backlight
>>> device we often register both the GPU's native backlight device and
>>> acpi_video's firmware acpi_video# backlight device. This relies on
>>> userspace preferring firmware type backlight devices over native ones, but
>>> registering 2 backlight devices for a single display really is undesirable.
>>>
>>> On x86 laptops where the native GPU backlight device should be used,
>>> the registering of other backlight devices is avoided by their drivers
>>> using acpi_video_get_backlight_type() and only registering their backlight
>>> if the return value matches their type.
>>>
>>> acpi_video_get_backlight_type() uses
>>> backlight_device_get_by_type(BACKLIGHT_RAW) to determine if a native
>>> driver is available and will never return native if this returns
>>> false. This means that the GPU's native backlight registering code
>>> cannot just call acpi_video_get_backlight_type() to determine if it
>>> should register its backlight, since acpi_video_get_backlight_type() will
>>> never return native until the native backlight has already registered.
>>>
>>> To fix this add a native function parameter to
>>> acpi_video_get_backlight_type(), which when set to true will make
>>> acpi_video_get_backlight_type() behave as if a native backlight has
>>> already been registered.
Regarding the question below, this is the part that throws me off.
>>>
>>> Note that all current callers are updated to pass false for the new
>>> parameter, so this change in itself causes no functional changes.
>>
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
>>> index becc198e4c22..0a06f0edd298 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/video_detect.c
>>> @@ -17,12 +17,14 @@
>>> * Otherwise vendor specific drivers like thinkpad_acpi, asus-laptop,
>>> * sony_acpi,... can take care about backlight brightness.
>>> *
>>> - * Backlight drivers can use acpi_video_get_backlight_type() to determine
>>> - * which driver should handle the backlight.
>>> + * Backlight drivers can use acpi_video_get_backlight_type() to determine which
>>> + * driver should handle the backlight. RAW/GPU-driver backlight drivers must
>>> + * pass true for the native function argument, other drivers must pass false.
>>> *
>>> * If CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO is neither set as "compiled in" (y) nor as a module (m)
>>> * this file will not be compiled and acpi_video_get_backlight_type() will
>>> - * always return acpi_backlight_vendor.
>>> + * return acpi_backlight_native when its native argument is true and
>>> + * acpi_backlight_vendor when it is false.
>>> */
>>
>> Frankly, I think the boolean native parameter here, and at the call
>> sites, is confusing, and the slightly different explanations in the
>> commit message and comment here aren't helping.
>
> Can you elaborate the "slightly different explanations in the
> commit message and comment" part a bit (so that I can fix this) ?
>
>> I suggest adding a separate function that the native backlight drivers
>> should use. I think it's more obvious all around, and easier to document
>> too.
>
> Code wise I think this would mean renaming the original and
> then adding 2 wrappers, but that is fine with me. I've no real
> preference either way and I'm happy with adding a new variant of
> acpi_video_get_backlight_type() for the native backlight drivers
> any suggestion for a name ?
Alternatively, do the native backlight drivers have any need for the
actual backlight type information from acpi? They only need to be able
to ask if they should register themselves, right?
I understand this sounds like bikeshedding, but I'm trying to avoid
duplicating the conditions in the drivers where a single predicate
function call could be sufficient, and the complexity could be hidden in
acpi.
if (!acpi_video_backlight_use_native())
return;
Perhaps all the drivers/platform/x86/* backlight drivers could use:
if (acpi_video_backlight_use_vendor())
...
You can still use the native parameter etc. internally, but just hide
the details from everyone else, and, hopefully, make it harder for them
to do silly things?
BR,
Jani.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-19 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-17 15:23 [PATCH 00/14] drm/kms: Stop registering multiple /sys/class/backlight devs for a single display Hans de Goede
2022-05-17 15:23 ` [PATCH 01/14] ACPI: video: Add a native function parameter to acpi_video_get_backlight_type() Hans de Goede
2022-05-18 8:55 ` Jani Nikula
2022-05-18 10:06 ` Hans de Goede
2022-05-19 9:02 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-06-21 10:06 ` Hans de Goede
2022-05-17 15:23 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915: Don't register backlight when another backlight should be used Hans de Goede
2022-05-17 15:23 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/amdgpu: " Hans de Goede
2022-05-17 15:23 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/radeon: " Hans de Goede
2022-05-17 15:23 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/nouveau: " Hans de Goede
2022-05-18 17:05 ` Lyude Paul
2022-05-17 15:23 ` [PATCH 06/14] ACPI: video: Drop backlight_device_get_by_type() call from acpi_video_get_backlight_type() Hans de Goede
2022-05-17 15:23 ` [PATCH 07/14] ACPI: video: Remove acpi_video_bus from list before tearing it down Hans de Goede
2022-05-17 15:23 ` [PATCH 08/14] ACPI: video: Simplify acpi_video_unregister_backlight() Hans de Goede
2022-05-17 15:23 ` [PATCH 09/14] ACPI: video: Make backlight class device registration a separate step Hans de Goede
2022-05-20 21:41 ` Daniel Dadap
2022-05-23 23:25 ` Daniel Dadap
2022-05-24 7:10 ` Hans de Goede
2022-05-17 15:23 ` [PATCH 10/14] ACPI: video: Remove code to unregister acpi_video backlight when a native backlight registers Hans de Goede
2022-05-17 15:23 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915: Call acpi_video_register_backlight() Hans de Goede
2022-05-17 15:23 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/nouveau: Register ACPI video backlight when nv_backlight registration fails Hans de Goede
2022-05-18 17:39 ` Lyude Paul
2022-06-03 6:55 ` Hans de Goede
2022-05-17 15:23 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/amdgpu: Register ACPI video backlight when skipping amdgpu backlight registration Hans de Goede
2022-05-17 15:23 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/radeon: Register ACPI video backlight when skipping radeon " Hans de Goede
2022-05-18 8:44 ` [PATCH 00/14] drm/kms: Stop registering multiple /sys/class/backlight devs for a single display Jani Nikula
2022-05-18 10:04 ` Hans de Goede
2022-05-18 10:12 ` Jani Nikula
2022-05-25 15:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2022-05-25 16:24 ` Daniel Dadap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pmk9dhe1.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Xinhui.Pan@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=ddadap@nvidia.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kherbst@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=markgross@kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).