dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
	Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
	Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@intel.com>
Cc: robdclark@chromium.org, Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] drm/dp: Allow an early call to register DDC i2c bus
Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 17:18:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8eedeb02dc56ecaed5d2f3cb8d929a3675b2c3da.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210503145750.v6.2.Iff8f2957d86af40f2bfcfb5a7163928481fccea4@changeid>

Adding ville from Intel to also get their take on this.

In general we've been trying to move DRM to a design where we don't expose any
devices until everything is ready. That's pretty much the main reason that we
register things during bridge attach time. Note though that even before the
DDC bus is registered it should still be usable, just things like get_device()
won't work.

This isn't the first time we've run into a problem like the one you're trying
to solve though, Tegra currently has a similar issue. Something we discussed
as a possible long-term solution for this was splitting i2c_add_adapter() into
a minimal initialization function and a registration function. Linux's device
core already allows for this (device_initialize() and device_add(), which are
called together when device_register() is called). Would this be a solution
that might work for you (and even better, would you possibly be willing to
write the patches? :)

On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 14:58 -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> It can be helpful to fully register the AUX channel as an i2c bus even
> before the bridge is created. Let's optionally allow bridges to do
> that.
> 
> Specifically the case we're running into:
> - The panel driver wants to get its DDC bus at probe time.
> - The ti-sn65dsi86 MIPI-to-eDP bridge code, which provides the DDC
>   bus, wants to get the panel at probe time.
> 
> The next patches ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Promote the AUX channel
> to its own sub-dev") solves the chicken-and-egg problem by breaking
> the ti-sn65dsi86 driver into sub-devices, but in order for it to
> actually work we need the i2c bus to get registered at probe time and
> not in bridge attach time.
> 
> Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v6:
> - ("drm/dp: Allow an early call to register DDC i2c bus") new for v6.
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h     |  2 +
>  2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> index cb56d74e9d38..830294f0b341 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> @@ -1757,6 +1757,49 @@ void drm_dp_aux_init(struct drm_dp_aux *aux)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_aux_init);
>  
> +/**
> + * drm_dp_aux_register_ddc() - register the DDC parts of the aux channel
> + * @aux: DisplayPort AUX channel
> + *
> + * This can be called after drm_dp_aux_init() to fully register the ddc bus
> + * as an i2c adapter with the rest of Linux.
> + *
> + * If you don't explicitly call this function it will be done implicitly as
> + * part of drm_dp_aux_register().
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
> + */
> +int drm_dp_aux_register_ddc(struct drm_dp_aux *aux)
> +{
> +       WARN_ON_ONCE(!aux->dev);
> +
> +       aux->ddc.class = I2C_CLASS_DDC;
> +       aux->ddc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> +       aux->ddc.dev.parent = aux->dev;
> +
> +       strlcpy(aux->ddc.name, aux->name ? aux->name : dev_name(aux->dev),
> +               sizeof(aux->ddc.name));
> +
> +       return i2c_add_adapter(&aux->ddc);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_aux_register_ddc);
> +
> +/**
> + * drm_dp_aux_unregister_ddc() - unregister the DDC parts of the aux
> channel
> + *
> + * This is useful if you called drm_dp_aux_register_ddc(). If you let
> + * drm_dp_aux_register() implicitly register the DDC for you then you don't
> + * need to worry about calling this yourself.
> + *
> + * @aux: DisplayPort AUX channel
> + */
> +void drm_dp_aux_unregister_ddc(struct drm_dp_aux *aux)
> +{
> +       i2c_del_adapter(&aux->ddc);
> +       aux->ddc.dev.parent = NULL;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_aux_unregister_ddc);
> +
>  /**
>   * drm_dp_aux_register() - initialise and register aux channel
>   * @aux: DisplayPort AUX channel
> @@ -1793,20 +1836,19 @@ int drm_dp_aux_register(struct drm_dp_aux *aux)
>         if (!aux->ddc.algo)
>                 drm_dp_aux_init(aux);
>  
> -       aux->ddc.class = I2C_CLASS_DDC;
> -       aux->ddc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> -       aux->ddc.dev.parent = aux->dev;
> -
> -       strlcpy(aux->ddc.name, aux->name ? aux->name : dev_name(aux->dev),
> -               sizeof(aux->ddc.name));
> +       /*
> +        * Implicitly register if drm_dp_aux_register_ddc() wasn't already
> +        * called (as evidenced by a NULL parent pointer).
> +        */
> +       if (!aux->ddc.dev.parent) {
> +               ret = drm_dp_aux_register_ddc(aux);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       return ret;
> +       }
>  
>         ret = drm_dp_aux_register_devnode(aux);
> -       if (ret)
> -               return ret;
> -
> -       ret = i2c_add_adapter(&aux->ddc);
>         if (ret) {
> -               drm_dp_aux_unregister_devnode(aux);
> +               drm_dp_aux_unregister_ddc(aux);
>                 return ret;
>         }
>  
> @@ -1821,7 +1863,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_aux_register);
>  void drm_dp_aux_unregister(struct drm_dp_aux *aux)
>  {
>         drm_dp_aux_unregister_devnode(aux);
> -       i2c_del_adapter(&aux->ddc);
> +       if (aux->ddc.dev.parent)
> +               drm_dp_aux_unregister_ddc(aux);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_aux_unregister);
>  
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> index e932b2c40095..d4d2d5e25bb7 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> @@ -2021,6 +2021,8 @@ bool drm_dp_lttpr_pre_emphasis_level_3_supported(const
> u8 caps[DP_LTTPR_PHY_CAP_
>  
>  void drm_dp_remote_aux_init(struct drm_dp_aux *aux);
>  void drm_dp_aux_init(struct drm_dp_aux *aux);
> +int drm_dp_aux_register_ddc(struct drm_dp_aux *aux);
> +void drm_dp_aux_unregister_ddc(struct drm_dp_aux *aux);
>  int drm_dp_aux_register(struct drm_dp_aux *aux);
>  void drm_dp_aux_unregister(struct drm_dp_aux *aux);
>  

-- 
Cheers,
 Lyude Paul (she/her)
 Software Engineer at Red Hat


  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-07 21:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-03 21:58 [PATCH v6 0/5] drm: Fix EDID reading on ti-sn65dsi86; solve some chicken-and-egg problems Douglas Anderson
2021-05-03 21:58 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] i2c: i2c-core-of: Fix corner case of finding adapter by node Douglas Anderson
2021-05-17 20:16   ` Doug Anderson
2021-05-03 21:58 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] drm/dp: Allow an early call to register DDC i2c bus Douglas Anderson
2021-05-07 21:18   ` Lyude Paul [this message]
2021-05-07 22:00     ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-05-07 22:09       ` Lyude Paul
2021-05-14 11:16         ` Jani Nikula
2021-05-17 20:17           ` Doug Anderson
2021-05-03 21:58 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Promote the AUX channel to its own sub-dev Douglas Anderson
2021-05-03 21:58 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Don't read EDID blob over DDC Douglas Anderson
2021-05-03 21:58 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Link the panel to the bridge's DDC bus Douglas Anderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8eedeb02dc56ecaed5d2f3cb8d929a3675b2c3da.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@siol.net \
    --cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    --cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
    --cc=steev@kali.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@intel.com \
    --cc=wsa@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).