From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Subject: Re: Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 14:11:45 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=3yJS8NUzbAcwT0gzFqp-2AbSPqA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201105201306.31204.luke@dashjr.org> <BANLkTimOqhNEsBEg6f=nMiMJqYGNyFJmeQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <201105202224.56867.rjw@sisk.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <201105202224.56867.rjw@sisk.pl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org>, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

2011/5/20 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> It is on the list of known regressions from 2.6.37, but we're not tracking
> them any more now that 2.6.39 is out.

Hopefully Chris is still tracking them, even if you aren't.

Chris? What other information can the affected person provide, or what
tests can he run to help close this out?