From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9F9C47097 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 02:53:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1390861246 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 02:53:24 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1390861246 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2E26F56A; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 02:53:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oo1-xc2e.google.com (mail-oo1-xc2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2e]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 944956F56A; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 02:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oo1-xc2e.google.com with SMTP id q20-20020a4a6c140000b029024915d1bd7cso242799ooc.12; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 19:53:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=59/o5WUFh0HgVtIfqnBcRLjnuCEyEPLe7i9E9Et2Nk0=; b=sDNdiWlwKUJ3hMjk3uR3Joh9gi0v3zzKJJfFKNTy3CHj55/JTgBm8Kvw21uS94yBjy uV7vur1Q8ATD4tgVEUUrxfHDsRTmTe9O9tXHa/VfLlY26kx2t0bNQGaNIZ0YR2G4Rb52 aoh7/w4Ikj3MCbUGaXmr3VaIqN1kIRmXUouw3W43tA6lw9oX6RglpIqUFTdJMZ6jytw3 ++EAlp4Et8/0xCpjau424k0LIe3eAV+PEDry2ayGkjhMgfm9WpxdLLNA5BxdsWeWy+HI fDi+Ph5SNXjSnD2asCgD4d1lZ//LjujV6/kImxH3CzxG5b0Duscd0pDFh4fZqgPFbHoB 1kDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=59/o5WUFh0HgVtIfqnBcRLjnuCEyEPLe7i9E9Et2Nk0=; b=ZUn5BCGbcHefszBpJfCLznr3vGyUaf5xIXBAf6KcKMDikV3CxjTlSVP5grBt2Gd7Rc Tn0IIzdkvhlAijAycSYdISlNdavyKZQ09SqIqD2T/y3WDs2rbN8uiJ8TCuze+b6KwM1K 9sczXwTIWiujXBXsADsINQE4VyxIiTn7KSnM5C5Y54Eyoia4JYzSffQy//WWjVv8rTNj 6+w/G0DlRLJi9gbzUcGTWoiTGst+RLo+wpPHly6Nt11H7YvcIBhWSZ7p8TJevi8Oq+3Z b6AVqiB6EgZYOcts453YAuaiy35w/9S28UCAwuNRSXPqeIV8LCfrn/O/oPZFNu3txadx YXOA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531NBH83DN0F+/Zb1fAkyis22ld3Rlwk0K9bPe6bd1v6tWZ17yMy 2c3/IArlHyAuxC9XreXjfJYNpE08XeTSXwPJEYA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJytfvSP1Lg7K9HXPuiuhCUyS1i3M9tOa/IoW8cmSYko9U7xwaVmBK1twuGf2I7oa9uz5y8O8GsM9nKBQemjdZI= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:d004:: with SMTP id h4mr1877872oor.90.1622775201900; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 19:53:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210601201702.23316-1-andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com> In-Reply-To: From: Alex Deucher Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 22:53:09 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] libdrm tests for hot-unplug feature To: Dave Airlie Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Deucher, Alexander" , Maling list - DRI developers , amd-gfx list , =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=C3=B6nig?= Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 9:37 PM Dave Airlie wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 07:20, Alex Deucher wrote: > > > > Please open a gitlab MR for these. > > > > I'd really prefer these tests all get migrated out of here into igt. I > don't think libdrm_amdgpu really should have tests that test the > kernel level infrastructure. > We are providing equivalent patches for IGT as well. There are some teams and customers that would prefer to stick with libdrm_amdgpu. > I know some people at AMD had issues in the past with igt because the > i might have stood for intel back in time, but at this point I think > we should be moving past that. I don't think that was ever an issue. It's more that some teams built a bunch of infrastructure that used libdrm tests and haven't had the resources to switch to IGT yet. Alex