On Thursday, February 4, 2021, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drivers-x86 tree got a conflict in:
>
>

Thanks. I already asked Patrick yesterday day if DRM missed to pull an
immutable tag I provided. I think they can pull and resolve conflicts
themselves. Alternatively it would be easy to resolve by Linus by removing
Kconfig lines along with mentioned files,


>   drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/Kconfig
>   drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/mdfld_device.c
>   drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/mdfld_dsi_output.c
>   drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/mdfld_output.c
>   drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/tc35876x-dsi-lvds.c
>
> between commits:
>
>   b51035c200bd ("drm/gma500: Remove Medfield support")
>   837f23bb4b60 ("drm/gma500: Drop DRM_GMA3600 config option")
>
> from the drm-misc tree and commit:
>
>   bfc838f8598e ("drm/gma500: Convert to use new SCU IPC API")
>   25ded39ad064 ("drm/gma500: Get rid of duplicate NULL checks")
>
> from the drivers-x86 tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the former removed the text that was updated by the
> latter and removed the last 4 files) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko