From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/lima: Reduce the amount of logs on deferred probe
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 08:45:09 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPfnhHcTYiyj1yLD6QR6CzkGMZMY7cihUrc8yWNr4ZLzuw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20190618185502.3839-1-krzk@kernel.org> <20190618185502.3839-2-krzk@kernel.org>
 <CAKGbVbvMVRiWXf8E8hpym_F7ovoXeeTc92-hh6hA6802487jOg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAKGbVbvMVRiWXf8E8hpym_F7ovoXeeTc92-hh6hA6802487jOg@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Qiang Yu <yuq825@gmail.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>, dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, lima@lists.freedesktop.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 at 02:55, Qiang Yu <yuq825@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It looks like lima_clk_init will have the same problem if devm_clk_get
> returns -EPROBE_DEFER.

Indeed, although I did not experience it but it is valid point. I'll send v2.

Best regards,
Krzysztof