From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E6EC433DF for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 20:49:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB2A92065F for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 20:49:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ffwll.ch header.i=@ffwll.ch header.b="JbTsxR3P" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CB2A92065F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ffwll.ch Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3E389AD2; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 20:49:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oo1-xc42.google.com (mail-oo1-xc42.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c42]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE28289AD2 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 20:49:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oo1-xc42.google.com with SMTP id t6so742151ooh.4 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 13:49:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iKzzj8zSTXcQ4stpa90DPw4HD3mp4PdLWYGCtZd2rco=; b=JbTsxR3PBqZV5d7QZxMjf1cpYNU3NhB1eROFkpXVDZntkDw+HMdQfLbF4ukgRo6qZW lTAH8wcvfNRko0J+gKKP8BVm0QuLm34SnnCJ5C0V1wD9saZnr2Geo0nuRMU1sGwvJCj+ vEoLoscckcK1Y1GdeZREEBQHeIcnp7yHdzHRY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iKzzj8zSTXcQ4stpa90DPw4HD3mp4PdLWYGCtZd2rco=; b=STHISa+Q5DmCZGFlUeUMTjl6+ouHJW1xPppHwF646imXCFRpp8r20cQ3+H9VBlYWYe xYtvVZiuwqSuY1VEb0zWW7gJMbPWIL0aDzMUgrxvfWhiKbNAJBoAsYGY8QfalcmZ78M8 RZ8DPDlLXvo36e/Atpf7pfBPgrwe7ucRX4qfJuGAl51APIRpNQoIqS7ed753NBv+n3Mg ogpcW77j//0VZ/UUhk0pUKzyM8j8aKejB7U/LAmdVxpEg6Lk0ePuZgmXrtlxdF8ztjaO 3EC92TsfW7qtr7xm2ypVHp3J0yqXSFfwZjFmczUYsAQ491c3X3bIMWoqLn+AM4tWPmGK 8EHA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532J29PvyRsVOql7yR4SB28W1EjIJvP8fGv5EgZjO219Ri6mgvL1 QZgTOxGKL/uEsOCtcKMLPUvcPNRjvq9mzrp2WKQiIQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJziLvwDTEmy76j+v/HNPYt2tB3GXWPfceubgXWnsQk3Vt+k66GrFFtZFVuc8vR6ZZ6wSvsrbwu/5DqIrxTIi5g= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:bb8a:: with SMTP id h10mr1049097oop.28.1594846149054; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 13:49:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200715145902.13122-1-tzimmermann@suse.de> In-Reply-To: From: Daniel Vetter Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 22:48:58 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] drm/mgag200: Support desktop chips To: Dave Airlie X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: John Donnelly , kernel test robot , Egbert Eich , dri-devel , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Gerd Hoffmann , Thomas Zimmermann , Dave Airlie , Sam Ravnborg , Emil Velikov Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 9:56 PM Dave Airlie wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 at 00:59, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > > > This patchset puts device initialization in the correct order and > > adds support for G200 Desktop chips (PCI ids 0x520 and 0x521). > > why? :-) > > I'm pretty sure I NAKed the previous version because the userspace > experience for these old cards was probably better with > xorg-x11-drv-mga, but hey maybe it isn't anymore and we should go > ahead. I know SuSE use these for testing, but apart from that do we > really think we have any users for this? I'm more of the "why not" kind ... if you don't want this driver, don't enable it. Maybe worst case the physical card driver ids should be a Kconfig option or so. But if the goal is to stomp fbdev into the ground I think we should be ok with having drivers for anything. Even if it's kinda horrible :-) Of course you're not going to get any kind of acceleration, but then modern desktops don't accelerate if you have anything less than maybe gles2 anyway, and that entire idea of a reasonable 2d api that's actually generally useful died a hundred times already. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel